eIBD Investor's Business Daily Digital Edition
INSTEAD OF LOBBYING OLYMPICS OFFICIALS
TO BRING THE GAMES TO HIS HOMETOWN OF CHICAGO,
PRESIDENT OBAMA SHOULD BE HUDDLING WITH LOCAL
OFFICIALS TO FIGURE OUT HOW TO CONTROL VIOLENCE THERE.
Some say Chicago is too broke to host the Olympics. Others say it's too corrupt. Above all, it's too dangerous. Crime is out of control, and the president shares some blame for the trend.
As an Illinois state senator representing South Side Chicago, he helped pass one lenient crime bill after another — and now he wants to go even further at the federal level.
Chicago is the new Murder Capital USA, passing New York with close to 500 homicides last year.
Teen gang violence is horrific, as the nation witnessed this week with the beating of an honor student outside a South Side high school. Derrion Albert was clubbed to death with a two-by-four, then kicked and stomped by a pack of crazed youth.
Following that, a 14-year-old boy was chased down in the same area and hit with a pipe, fracturing his skull. The teen was found lying in the road in a pool of blood. In the past year, school violence in Chicago has claimed the lives of 30 students.
This violent crime wave has gone unabated since actress Jennifer Hudson's mother, brother and nephew were gunned down last year in a triple homicide in Chicago.
As his hometown turned into a killing field, Obama remained silent until the Albert video inconveniently went viral in the middle of his and the first lady's courtship of Olympic honchos. Now he expresses belated shock through a spokesman.
Maybe there's a reason for his silence. As a local legislator, Obama was soft on violent gang crime, as we repeatedly noted on these pages before the election. He voted to weaken penalties on gangbangers who deal drugs in schools. He also blocked a bill that would send youth who commit a second violent felony to prison. He fought to keep even the most violent juvenile offenders out of the adult system.
Now at the federal level, he wants to repeal mandatory minimum sentences for crack and other drug offenders to stop what he calls the "warehousing" of such criminals. He also wants to "reform" the death penalty and outlaw police profiling of criminals.
Also on his and Attorney General Eric Holder's agenda: restoring voter rights for felons, expunging their criminal records and helping them get jobs at taxpayer expense.
About the only areas where he's not soft on crime involve "predatory lenders" and those who commit "hate crimes." He's ordered Holder to make their prosecution top priority.
Meanwhile, brutal homicides are exploding across the country. Nationwide homicide data from 2000-07 show a rate of increase among black teens more than twice that among white teens. An overwhelming share of the killings involve black-on-black crime.
Experts attribute it to the prison and "gangsta rap" culture that glamorizes juvenile violence.
Over the past few months, Obama has given major speeches to the NAACP and Congressional Black Caucus. He spoke a lot about the legacy of racism. He spoke nothing of the epidemic of black-on-black crime. The situation may only worsen as the black teen jobless rate, already at record levels, climbs even higher.
Part of the reason for the record unemployment is the 40% jump in the minimum wage that Democrats enacted in the middle of a recession. The last raise to $7.25 — one of three over three years — took effect in July, triggering a spike in teen joblessness in August.
Study after study shows hikes in the minimum wage kill jobs. Retailers operating on already thin margins are forced to cut payrolls to avoid losses from the higher mandated cost. Since most workers earning minimum wage are students and other youth, they suffer most. Recessions never saw the jobless rate for young workers break 50% — until now.
Just weeks before Obama took office, we warned readers about "The Coming Crime Wave." Now it's upon us. We need policies that will fight it, not feed it.
Chicagoland
BY THE EDITORS OF THE INVESTORS BUSINESS DAILY
INVESTORS.COM
THURSDAY, 01 OCTOBER 09
*********************************************************
BARRY SOETORO aka BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA
IS A
USURPER
He is not eligible to be
President of the United States
because he is not a Natural Born Citizen
as required by Article Two, Section One, Clause Five of the United States Constitution.
This is a fact REGARDLESS of
where he was born (Mombassa, Hawaii, Chicago, Mecca or Mars).
He is not eligible
because he was not born of
TWO PARENTS
BOTH OF WHOM WERE UNITED STATES CITIZENS
AT THE TIME OF HIS BIRTH
as required by the Constitution.
Barack Hussein Obama Jr. is not eligible to be President of the United States because – according to public admissions made by him – his “birth status was governed” by the United Kingdom. Obama further admits he was a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies at birth.
Since Barack Hussein Obama Jr. was, if born in the state of Hawaii, a dual citizen, who – according to his own State Department – owed allegiance to the Queen of England and United Kingdom at the time of his birth – he cannot therefore be a “natural born” citizen of the US according to Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5 of the US Constitution.
His father, who did not live in the United States for more than a couple of years, was a subject/ciitizen
of Kenya/Great Britain at the time of Barack’s birth and afterwards, AND further, as Barack himself admitted on his website during the 2008 campaign, Barack was therefore born SUBJECT TO THE GOVERNANCE OF GREAT BRITAIN.
Here is a direct quote from Obama's "Fight the Smears/Fact Check" 2008 website:
‘When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children…’ “
The FACT that he was not born of TWO US CITIZEN PARENTS is all that matters. The question of his birth certificate is a distraction (a distraction fostered by Obama’s supporters?) that ought not to occupy our time and resources. BUT if you are really convinced of the value of the COLB (certificate of live birth) that Obama posted on his website, see this:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/9830547/Sun-Yatsen-Certification-of-Live-Birth-in-Hawaii
Also, it is possible that he is not a United States
citizen at all through his mother if he was born in Kenya, as three witnesses have testified. The reason is because his mother could not pass her US citizenship on to her son because she did not live continuously in the United States for five full years after her fourteenth birthday as required by the US immigration law in effect during that period of time.
Check it out:
http://www.TheObamaFile.com/ObamaNaturalBorn.htm
Also, an excellent introductory primer on Obama Presiidential Eligibility is to be found at:
http://people.mags.net/tonchen/birthers.htm
His usurpation can only be corrected (1) by Congress through his Impeachment and Removal [something which will never happen in a Congress controlled by Pelosi/Reid], or (2) it can be
corrected by his resignation, which could happen if the public presssure on him to resign becomes great enough, or (3) by his removal by the United States Supreme Court affirming a Quo Warranto decision of the United States Federal District Court for the District of Columbia [which process Attorney General Eric Holder would never allow to even begin] or (4) by an amendment to the Constitution,
which will never happen because that again would require the agreement of a Congress controlled by Pelosi/Reid.
_
HERE IS THE QUESTION WHICH EVERY AMERICAN CITIZEN SHOULD BE ASKING HIS OR HER CONGRESSMAN AND SENATORS
“During the 2008 election, then Senator Obama published a statement at his website which said that his birth status was ‘governed’ by the British Nationality Act of 1948. Can you please tell me, and the American people, how a person governed - at birth - by British law, can be a natural born citizen of the United States and thus constitutionally eligible to be President of the United States?”
---
- Leo Rugiens
No comments:
Post a Comment