**************
The map shows the counties of the United States with the color indicating whether the individual county cast a majority of its votes for the Republican candidate (RED) or the Democrat candidate (BLUE).
Professor Joseph Olson of Hemline University School of Law,
St. Paul, Minnesota, points out facts of 2008 Presidential election:
Number of States won by:
Democrats: 19
Republicans: 29
Square miles of land won by:
Democrats: 580,000
Republicans: 2,427,000
Population of counties won by:
Democrats: 127 million
Republicans: 143 million
Murder rate per 100,000 residents in counties won by:
Democrats: 13.2
Republicans: 2.1
Professor Olson adds:
"In aggregate, the map of the territory Republican won by Republicans
was mostly the land owned by the taxpaying citizens of the country.
Democrat territory mostly encompassed those citizens living in
government-owned tenements and living off various forms of
government welfare."
Professor Olson believes the United States is now somewhere
between the "complacency and apathy" phase of Professor Tyler's
definition of democracy, with some forty percent of the nation's
population already having reached the "governmental dependency" phase.
If Congress grants amnesty and citizenship to twenty million criminal
invaders called illegal's and they vote, then we can say goodbye to
the USA in fewer than five years
It was the fear of the Founding Fathers that the election of the president by direct popular vote with the majority prevailing would result in the "tyranny of the majority" and which they sought to avoid by creating the Electoral College. Under the Electoral College system small states and rural states would normally have an important voice in the outcome of an election and the election would not be dominated by the large populous states.
Why did not the Electoral College system prevent the absurdity of what is shown by the map above and the analysis of Professor Joseph Olson?
I believe that the important difference was ACORN.
The Democrats those states which in the past had balanced the power of the Republicans against the Democrats such as Florida, Ohio and New Mexico.
ACORN conducted very aggressive voter registration drives in those key states and there is evidence that many illegal voters were registered and voted. Their votes made the difference.
The Republican Party is weak and some would say stupid. The Party saw what was going on and did nothing to stop it. Small wonder then that the outcome of the election is what it is.
What does this foreshadow for the future. Barack Hussein Obama worked for and funded ACORN in the past. Is it unreasonable to believe that he and the Congress controlled by the Democrats will not strengthen ACORN.
LOOK OUT AMERICA!
THE OUTCOME OF THE ELECTION OF 2012 MAY HAVE BEEN DECIDED
IN 2008.
| |
Professor Joseph Olson of Hemline University School of Law,
St. Paul, Minnesota, points out facts of 2008 Presidential election:
Number of States won by:
Democrats: 19
Republicans: 29
Square miles of land won by:
Democrats: 580,000
Republicans: 2,427,000
Population of counties won by:
Democrats: 127 million
Republicans: 143 million
Murder rate per 100,000 residents in counties won by:
Democrats: 13.2
Republicans: 2.1
Professor Olson adds:
"In aggregate, the map of the territory Republican won by Republicans
was mostly the land owned by the taxpaying citizens of the country.
Democrat territory mostly encompassed those citizens living in
government-owned tenements and living off various forms of
government welfare."
Professor Olson believes the United States is now somewhere
between the "complacency and apathy" phase of Professor Tyler's
definition of democracy, with some forty percent of the nation's
population already having reached the "governmental dependency" phase.
If Congress grants amnesty and citizenship to twenty million criminal
invaders called illegal's and they vote, then we can say goodbye to
the USA in fewer than five years
It was the fear of the Founding Fathers that the election of the president by direct popular vote with the majority prevailing would result in the "tyranny of the majority" and which they sought to avoid by creating the Electoral College. Under the Electoral College system small states and rural states would normally have an important voice in the outcome of an election and the election would not be dominated by the large populous states.
Why did not the Electoral College system prevent the absurdity of what is shown by the map above and the analysis of Professor Joseph Olson?
I believe that the important difference was ACORN.
The Democrats those states which in the past had balanced the power of the Republicans against the Democrats such as Florida, Ohio and New Mexico.
ACORN conducted very aggressive voter registration drives in those key states and there is evidence that many illegal voters were registered and voted. Their votes made the difference.
The Republican Party is weak and some would say stupid. The Party saw what was going on and did nothing to stop it. Small wonder then that the outcome of the election is what it is.
What does this foreshadow for the future. Barack Hussein Obama worked for and funded ACORN in the past. Is it unreasonable to believe that he and the Congress controlled by the Democrats will not strengthen ACORN.
LOOK OUT AMERICA!
THE OUTCOME OF THE ELECTION OF 2012 MAY HAVE BEEN DECIDED
IN 2008.
No comments:
Post a Comment