!!!!
Our NEW Civil War
by garnet92
http://peskytruth.wordpress.com/2013/10/05/our-new-civil-war/
Make no mistake about it; we are slap-dab in the middle of a new civil war in this country. It’s not a formally declared war and it might be lurking just below the surface, but it is a battle nonetheless.
We have two factions at war with each other to determine the future of the United States.
On one side, we have the informed, politically aware portion of the citizenry.
.
While they listen to what our national leaders are saying and what the talking heads and pundits allow, they don’t assume they’re being told the truth, instead they dig deeper, seeking to verify the veracity of what is said.
.
There is a long-held belief about politicians: that is that they lie. The vast majority of the public believes that. It may be cynical, but to most of our population, it is the truth.
.
Why then would so many allow themselves to be taken in by a politician’s statements?.
.
It doesn’t take long to identify which politicians play fast and loose with facts. The informed citizen lives by the admonition to distrust, and verify. That admonition holds true regardless of the political party of the politician.
.
There’s an old adage in the computer world: “garbage in, garbage out,” which means that without good, clean, valid input, it’s impossible to render a good, clean, valid output. That is true of any decision. Without real facts, one simply can’t make a good decision.
.
The informed army is armed with facts when making decisions about issues of the day.
On the other side, there are the uninformed; the army of the unknowing and uncaring – the “low information voters.”
.
They don’t really understand what is going on, nor do they care enough to be curious, they’re too engrossed with NCIS, Dancing with the Stars, or Honey Boo Boo to be bothered. While they do care about the results and how those results will affect them, they simply aren’t engaged enough to recognize that they’re being sold a handful of magic beans.
.
They aren’t well informed and often, when interviewed on the street, can’t even name our three branches of government, or how many Supreme Court Justices sit on the court. And what’s worse, they won’t exert any effort to learn the facts about the issues facing the country in order to cast a more informed vote.
.
They’ll overhear a few snippets of news from the media news outlets or get their knowledge of current events from late night comedy shows and that’s about the extent of their knowledge of what’s happening in D.C., to their tax money and to their freedoms.
.
Their opinions are formed by hearing media sound bites, but they never challenge the veracity of what they’re being told. They are being influenced by those with a vested interest in slanting the “news” to favor a liberal agenda – and they blindly accept it.
.
They are essentially puppets; but unfortunately, puppets who vote.
And their vote counts the same as a citizen who has been engaged and informed. One who has studied, read, considered pros and cons, and arrived at a reasoned conclusion based on facts and truth.
It doesn’t really seem fair, does it?
.
Consider for a moment how engaged our founders were. They risked “their lives, their fortunes, their sacred honor” to create our United States. And many of them lost their lives, fortunes, and were castigated for their actions. Consider our soldiers, sailors, airmen, and marines, weren’t they engaged? Many were so engaged, that they lost their lives protecting our way of life.
Is it too much to expect that a voting citizen be at least minimally informed when exercising his or her civic duty?
.
Some may disagree, but it is my firm conviction that if the electorate had been fully informed of the qualifications and character of the candidates for President in 2008, Barack Obama wouldn’t have been elected the first time, much less for a second term. The so-called fourth estate purposefully insulated him from any negatives and built him up to be the country’s savior. Now, because they’re afraid of losing their façade of infallibility, they can’t admit that they were wrong – and so they double down and continue to support him - ignoring his readily apparent inadequacies.
.
So here we are again, tumbling head over heels into another crisis. We, the informed, are trying to do the right thing for the future of our country, our children and grandchildren. But we’re being blamed for all manner of ills by the propaganda machine. And the uninformed are accepting statements made by the president and his sycophants as being the gospel truth when, in fact, much of what they’re saying are intentional lies and/or obfuscations.
.
The other side has been winning battle after battle based on ignorance alone. And the other side’s generals know that they can depend on the ignorance of their army of puppets to win the day simply based on their numbers.
.
Actually, the uninformed army of LIVs isn’t literally told what to do or how to vote, they’re simply herded like sheep towards a desired conclusion by the media’s choice of what they reveal and what they hide. Even when some anti-administration subject can’t be ignored by the media, they’ll influence their army’s opinion by a judicious choice of words describing the subject (it’s called “spin”).
.
We are in a vulnerable position when our Constitution, our Bill of Rights, and our economic well-being are all being jeopardized by the votes of an army of uninformed puppets.
.
The only way we can win this not-so-civil war is to break through and inform a sizeable number of the previously uninformed opposition about the issues confronting our country and depend on facts, truth, and informed common sense to prevail.
.
.
The battle of 2014 looms large.
garnet92 | October 5, 2013 at 10:49 AM | Tags: Barack Obama, Democrat, Democrats, liberals, low information voter, MSM | Categories: Political | URL: http://wp.me/pL408-nJ
Offering a conservative counterbalance to the extreme left-coast liberalism of The Huffington Post
Saturday, October 5, 2013
YOU HAVE NO IDEA OF THE AMOUNT OF UNCONSTITUTIONAL GARBAGE CONTAINED IN THE OBAMACARE ACT
!!!!
A
retired Constitutional lawyer has read the entire proposed health care bill.
Read his conclusions and pass this on as you wish. This is stunning!
The Truth About the Health Care Bills
–
Michael Connelly, Ret. Constitutional Attorney
Well, I have done it! I have read the entire text of
proposed House Bill 3200:
The Affordable Health Care Choices Act of 2009.
I
studied it with particular emphasis from my area of expertise,
constitutional law. I was frankly concerned that parts of the proposed law
that were being discussed might be unconstitutional. What I found was far
worse than what I had heard or expected.
To begin with, much of what has been said about the law
and its implications is in fact true, despite what the Democrats and the
media are saying. The law does provide for rationing of health care,
particularly where senior citizens and other classes of citizens are
involved, free health care for illegal immigrants, free abortion services,
and probably forced participation in abortions by members of the
medical profession.
The Bill will also eventually force private insurance
companies out of business, and put everyone into a government run system.
All decisions about personal health care will ultimately be made by federal
bureaucrats, and most of them will not be health care professionals.
Hospital admissions, payments to physicians, and allocations of necessary
medical devices will be strictly controlled by the government.
However, as scary as all of that is, it just scratches
the surface. In fact, I have concluded that this legislation really has no
intention of providing affordable health care choices. Instead it is a
convenient cover for the most massive transfer of power to the Executive
Branch of government that has ever occurred, or even been contemplated. If
this law or a similar one is adopted, major portions of the Constitution of
the United States will effectively have been destroyed.
The first thing to go will be the masterfully
crafted balance of power between the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial
branches of the U.S. Government. The Congress will be transferring to the
Obama Administration authority in a number of different areas over the lives
of the American people, and the businesses they own.
The irony is that the Congress doesn't have any
authority to legislate in most of those areas to begin with! I defy anyone
to read the text of the U.S. Constitution and find any authority granted to
the members of Congress to regulate health care.
This legislation also provides for access, by the
appointees of the Obama administration, in direct violation of the specific
provisions of the 4th Amendment to the Constitution, of all of your personal
healthcare information, your personal financial information, and the
information of your employer, physician, and hospital. All of this is a
protecting against unreasonable searches and seizures. You can also
forget about the right to privacy. That will have been legislated into
oblivion regardless of what the 3rd and 4th Amendments may provide.
If you decide not to have healthcare insurance, or if
you have private insurance that is not deemed acceptable to the Health
Choices Administrator appointed by Obama, there will be a tax imposed on
you. It is called a tax instead of a fine because of the intent to avoid
application of the due process clause of the 5th Amendment. However , that
doesn't work because since there is nothing in the law that allows you to
contest or appeal the imposition of the tax, it is definitely depriving
someone of property without the due process of law.
So, there are three of those pesky amendments that the
far left hate so much, out the original ten in the Bill of Rights, that are
effectively nullified by this law. It doesn't stop there though.
The 9th Amendment that provides: The enumeration
in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or
disparage others retained by the people;
The 10th Amendment states: The powers not delegated to
the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States,
are preserved to the States respectively, or to the people. Under the
provisions of this piece of Congressional handiwork neither the people nor
the states are going to have any rights or powers at all in many areas that
once were theirs to control.
I
could write many more pages about this legislation, but I think you get the
idea. This is not about health care; it is about seizing power and limiting
rights. Article 6 of the Constitution requires the members of both houses of
Congress to "be bound by oath or affirmation to support the Constitution."
If I was a member of Congress I would not be able to vote for this
legislation or anything like it, without feeling I was violating that
sacred oath or affirmation. If I voted for it anyway, I would hope the
American people would hold me accountable.
For those who might doubt the nature of this threat, I
suggest they consult the source, the US Constitution, and Bill of Rights.
There you can see exactly what we are about to have taken from us.
Michael Connelly
Retired attorney,
Constitutional Law Instructor
Carrollton , Texas
Thursday, October 3, 2013
IS THE LIBERAL MEDIA FINALLY WAKING UP TO THE DAMAGE THEY DID TO AMERICA BY SUPPORTING OBAMA'S BID TO BE PRESIDENT?
!!!!
The Cover of Liberal Newsweek Magazine:
Finally, Matt Patterson and Newsweek speak out about
Obama. This is timely and tough. As many of you know, Newsweek has a reputation
for being extremely liberal. The fact that their editor saw fit to print the
following article about Obama and the one that appears in the latest Newsweek,
makes this a truly amazing event, and a news story in and of itself. At last,
the truth about our President and his agenda are starting to trickle through
the "protective
wall” built around him by the liberal media....
______________________________ ______________________________ __
I Too Have Become
Disillusioned
by Matt Patterson (Newsweek Columnist – Opinion Writer)
by Matt Patterson (Newsweek Columnist – Opinion Writer)
Years from now, historians may regard the 2008 election of
Barack Obama as an inscrutable and disturbing phenomenon, the result of a
baffling breed of mass hysteria akin perhaps to the witch craze of the Middle
Ages. How, they will wonder, did a man so devoid of professional accomplishment
beguile so many into thinking he could manage the world's largest economy,
direct the world's most powerful military, execute the world's most
consequential job?
Imagine a future historian examining Obama's pre-presidential life: ushered into and through the Ivy League, despite unremarkable grades and test scores along the way; a cushy non-job as a "community organizer;" a brief career as a state legislator devoid of legislative achievement (and in fact nearly devoid of his attention, less often did he vote "present"); and finally an unaccomplished single term in the United States Senate, the entirety of which was devoted to his presidential ambitions.
He left no academic legacy in academia, authored no signature legislation as a legislator. And then there is the matter of his troubling associations: the white-hating, America-loathing preacher who for decades served as Obama's "spiritual mentor;" a real-life, actual terrorist who served as Obama's colleague and political sponsor. It is easy to imagine a future historian looking at it all and asking: how on Earth was such a man elected president?
Not content to wait for history, the incomparable Norman Podhoretz addressed the question recently in the Wall Street Journal: To be sure, no white candidate who had close associations with an outspoken hater of America like Jeremiah Wright and an unrepentant terrorist like Bill Ayers, would have lasted a single day. But because Mr. Obama was black, and therefore entitled in the eyes of liberal Dom to have hung out with protesters against various American injustices, even if they were 'a bit' extreme, he was given a pass. Let that sink in: Obama was given a pass - held to a lower standard - because of the color of his skin.
Podhoretz continues: And in any case, what did such ancient history matter when he was also so articulate and elegant and (as he himself had said) "non-threatening," all of which gave him a fighting chance to become the first black president and thereby to lay the curse of racism to rest?
Podhoretz puts his finger, I think, on the animating pulse of the Obama phenomenon - affirmative action. Not in the legal sense, of course. But certainly in the motivating sentiment behind all affirmative action laws and regulations, which are designed primarily to make white people, and especially white liberals, feel good about themselves.
Unfortunately, minorities often suffer so that whites can pat themselves on the back. Liberals routinely admit minorities to schools for which they are not qualified, yet take no responsibility for the inevitable poor performance and high drop-out rates which follow. Liberals don't care if these minority students fail; liberals aren't around to witness the emotional devastation and deflated self-esteem resulting from the racist policy that is affirmative action. Yes, racist. Holding someone to a separate standard merely because of the color of his skin - that's affirmative action in a nutshell, and if that isn't racism, then nothing is.
And that is what America did to Obama. True, Obama himself was never troubled by his lack of achievements, but why would he be? As many have noted, Obama was told he was good enough for Columbia despite undistinguished grades at Occidental; he was told he was good enough for the US Senate despite a mediocre record in Illinois ; he was told he was good enough to be president despite no record at all in the Senate. All his life, every step of the way, Obama was told he was good enough for the next step, in spite of ample evidence to the contrary.
What could this breed if not the sort of empty narcissism on display every time Obama speaks? In 2008, many who agreed that he lacked executive qualifications nonetheless raved about Obama's oratory skills, intellect, and cool character. Those people – conservatives included - ought now to be deeply embarrassed.
The man thinks and speaks in the hoariest of clichés, and that's when he has his Teleprompters in front of him; when the prompter is absent he can barely think or speak at all. Not one original idea has ever issued from his mouth - it's all warmed-over Marxism of the kind that has failed over and over again for 100 years. (An example is his 2012 campaign speeches which are almost word for word his 2008 speeches)
And what about his character? Obama is constantly blaming anything and everything else for his troubles. Bush did it; it was bad luck; I inherited this mess. Remember, he wanted the job, campaigned for the task. It is embarrassing to see a president so willing to advertise his own powerlessness, so comfortable with his own incompetence. (The other day he actually came out and said no one could have done anything to get our economy and country back on track). But really, what were we to expect? The man has never been responsible for anything, so how do we expect him to act responsibly?
In short: our president is a small-minded man, with neither the temperament nor the intellect to handle his job. When you understand that, and only when you understand that, will the current erosion of liberty and prosperity make sense? It could not have gone otherwise with such an impostor in the Oval Office.
Imagine a future historian examining Obama's pre-presidential life: ushered into and through the Ivy League, despite unremarkable grades and test scores along the way; a cushy non-job as a "community organizer;" a brief career as a state legislator devoid of legislative achievement (and in fact nearly devoid of his attention, less often did he vote "present"); and finally an unaccomplished single term in the United States Senate, the entirety of which was devoted to his presidential ambitions.
He left no academic legacy in academia, authored no signature legislation as a legislator. And then there is the matter of his troubling associations: the white-hating, America-loathing preacher who for decades served as Obama's "spiritual mentor;" a real-life, actual terrorist who served as Obama's colleague and political sponsor. It is easy to imagine a future historian looking at it all and asking: how on Earth was such a man elected president?
Not content to wait for history, the incomparable Norman Podhoretz addressed the question recently in the Wall Street Journal: To be sure, no white candidate who had close associations with an outspoken hater of America like Jeremiah Wright and an unrepentant terrorist like Bill Ayers, would have lasted a single day. But because Mr. Obama was black, and therefore entitled in the eyes of liberal Dom to have hung out with protesters against various American injustices, even if they were 'a bit' extreme, he was given a pass. Let that sink in: Obama was given a pass - held to a lower standard - because of the color of his skin.
Podhoretz continues: And in any case, what did such ancient history matter when he was also so articulate and elegant and (as he himself had said) "non-threatening," all of which gave him a fighting chance to become the first black president and thereby to lay the curse of racism to rest?
Podhoretz puts his finger, I think, on the animating pulse of the Obama phenomenon - affirmative action. Not in the legal sense, of course. But certainly in the motivating sentiment behind all affirmative action laws and regulations, which are designed primarily to make white people, and especially white liberals, feel good about themselves.
Unfortunately, minorities often suffer so that whites can pat themselves on the back. Liberals routinely admit minorities to schools for which they are not qualified, yet take no responsibility for the inevitable poor performance and high drop-out rates which follow. Liberals don't care if these minority students fail; liberals aren't around to witness the emotional devastation and deflated self-esteem resulting from the racist policy that is affirmative action. Yes, racist. Holding someone to a separate standard merely because of the color of his skin - that's affirmative action in a nutshell, and if that isn't racism, then nothing is.
And that is what America did to Obama. True, Obama himself was never troubled by his lack of achievements, but why would he be? As many have noted, Obama was told he was good enough for Columbia despite undistinguished grades at Occidental; he was told he was good enough for the US Senate despite a mediocre record in Illinois ; he was told he was good enough to be president despite no record at all in the Senate. All his life, every step of the way, Obama was told he was good enough for the next step, in spite of ample evidence to the contrary.
What could this breed if not the sort of empty narcissism on display every time Obama speaks? In 2008, many who agreed that he lacked executive qualifications nonetheless raved about Obama's oratory skills, intellect, and cool character. Those people – conservatives included - ought now to be deeply embarrassed.
The man thinks and speaks in the hoariest of clichés, and that's when he has his Teleprompters in front of him; when the prompter is absent he can barely think or speak at all. Not one original idea has ever issued from his mouth - it's all warmed-over Marxism of the kind that has failed over and over again for 100 years. (An example is his 2012 campaign speeches which are almost word for word his 2008 speeches)
And what about his character? Obama is constantly blaming anything and everything else for his troubles. Bush did it; it was bad luck; I inherited this mess. Remember, he wanted the job, campaigned for the task. It is embarrassing to see a president so willing to advertise his own powerlessness, so comfortable with his own incompetence. (The other day he actually came out and said no one could have done anything to get our economy and country back on track). But really, what were we to expect? The man has never been responsible for anything, so how do we expect him to act responsibly?
In short: our president is a small-minded man, with neither the temperament nor the intellect to handle his job. When you understand that, and only when you understand that, will the current erosion of liberty and prosperity make sense? It could not have gone otherwise with such an impostor in the Oval Office.
Tuesday, October 1, 2013
A PRESIDENT AS CLUELESS AS EVER, GOD HELP US!
!!!!
A president as clueless as ever
By Wesley Pruden
Monday, September 30, 2013
.
Barack Obama is no Bill Clinton in the pantheon of romancers and boudoir bandits, but he is the president, after all, and his vain search for love in all the wrong places is enough to break a heart of stone. He just can’t believe that Hasan Rouhani, the new president of Iran, is just not that into him. (Isn’t everybody?)
.
Not since Jimmy Carter chased Teddy Kennedy around the platform at the Democratic National Convention in 1980, begging for the traditional hands-above-the-head gesture of acclamation by rivals for the nomination, has an American president been so publicly scorned, rebuked and humiliated. That’s why he’s so desperate to bring on the health care train wreck. He must look tough at something.
.
The Iranians are skilled at embarrassing American presidents. Bubba tried to get the eye of Mohammed Khatami, an earlier president of Iran, at the United Nations in 2000, and was similarly snubbed. Bubba was willing to buy lunch, but could not even get a wink of recognition.
Before that, Ronald Reagan, who should have recognized that a search for a moderate in Iran is the ultimate snipe hunt, sent the famous cake in the shape of a key to Tehran — whether of German chocolate, red velvet or plain old sheet cake with buttercream icing, we were never told. There were no takers; it was the Gipper who suffered the indigestion.
.
Humiliating Mr. Obama is not as much fun as humiliating the likes of Bubba and the Gipper, because it’s so much easier to do. The new regime in Tehran makes no pretense of graciousness in triumph; even a homecoming queen will usually spare the feelings of the nerd with the slide rule in his shirt pocket who screws up the courage to ask her to dance. Mr. Obama, unlike the nerd, just keeps going back for more of the same. Like his predecessors, he never flags in his search for the nonexistent “moderate.”
.
It’s clear to everyone who has been paying attention that the only pursuit the Iranians are interested in is the pursuit of nuclear weapons. The ayatollahs who pull the strings in Tehran, the only politicians in Iran who are relevant to anything important, are pushing ahead to further refine weapons-grade enriched uranium. They know better than to keep doing things that don’t work, so after the years of public bluster and gasbaggery, vowing to demolish the Great Satan and wipe Israel off the map, they dispatched Mr. Rouhani to dispense candy and flowers (and champagne, if they had any) to the gullible in the West. The sanctions are hurting, and like the pain of tight shoes, the pain of sanctions only worsens with time.
.
The gullibility of the West is the secret weapon of the mullahs — not only in Iran, but throughout the Muslim world. The mullahs, who are not above a little mild flirtation, string along presidents and prime ministers to make the inevitable snub all the more satisfying. Mr. Rouhani’s agents were pleased to go along with the minuet at the United Nations. They gave the White House a nudge and a wink, which the White House passed on to the gullible reporters, suggesting the time and place when and where Mr. Rouhani would acknowledge the deep bow that Mr. Obama always takes when he runs into a Muslim and reach for the American president’s proffered hand.
.
But it never happened. Anyone else could recognize a snub, but the ayatollahs knew their mark. They could count on Mr. Obama to make their excuses. “The Iranians have an internal dynamic that they have to manage,” an Obama aide told reporters.
.
That “internal dynamic” is the cultivated glee the ayatollahs take in insulting the Great Satan. This “internal dynamic” was on display the day before Mr. Rouhani left for New York and the United Nations. Flanked by his army’s chief of staff and the commander of the Revolutionary Guard, he presided over the annual parade of weapons through downtown Tehran. There was nothing sweet in sight. Banners on the trucks towing the Shahab-3 missiles, whose 800-mile range puts them within striking distance of both Israel and American bases in the Middle East, proclaimed that “America is not as powerful as it claims to be.” Another proclaimed that “Israel should cease to exist.” Not as sweet as the talk at Turtle Bay, but proof that nothing changes in Tehran.
.
Alas, nothing has changed in Washington, either. The president of the United States is as clueless as ever.
.
.
.
Wesley Pruden is editor emeritus of The Washington Times.
Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/sep/30/pruden-a-president-as-clueless-as-ever/#ixzz2gXOzWU9B
A president as clueless as ever
By Wesley Pruden
Monday, September 30, 2013
.
Barack Obama is no Bill Clinton in the pantheon of romancers and boudoir bandits, but he is the president, after all, and his vain search for love in all the wrong places is enough to break a heart of stone. He just can’t believe that Hasan Rouhani, the new president of Iran, is just not that into him. (Isn’t everybody?)
.
Not since Jimmy Carter chased Teddy Kennedy around the platform at the Democratic National Convention in 1980, begging for the traditional hands-above-the-head gesture of acclamation by rivals for the nomination, has an American president been so publicly scorned, rebuked and humiliated. That’s why he’s so desperate to bring on the health care train wreck. He must look tough at something.
.
The Iranians are skilled at embarrassing American presidents. Bubba tried to get the eye of Mohammed Khatami, an earlier president of Iran, at the United Nations in 2000, and was similarly snubbed. Bubba was willing to buy lunch, but could not even get a wink of recognition.
Before that, Ronald Reagan, who should have recognized that a search for a moderate in Iran is the ultimate snipe hunt, sent the famous cake in the shape of a key to Tehran — whether of German chocolate, red velvet or plain old sheet cake with buttercream icing, we were never told. There were no takers; it was the Gipper who suffered the indigestion.
.
Humiliating Mr. Obama is not as much fun as humiliating the likes of Bubba and the Gipper, because it’s so much easier to do. The new regime in Tehran makes no pretense of graciousness in triumph; even a homecoming queen will usually spare the feelings of the nerd with the slide rule in his shirt pocket who screws up the courage to ask her to dance. Mr. Obama, unlike the nerd, just keeps going back for more of the same. Like his predecessors, he never flags in his search for the nonexistent “moderate.”
.
It’s clear to everyone who has been paying attention that the only pursuit the Iranians are interested in is the pursuit of nuclear weapons. The ayatollahs who pull the strings in Tehran, the only politicians in Iran who are relevant to anything important, are pushing ahead to further refine weapons-grade enriched uranium. They know better than to keep doing things that don’t work, so after the years of public bluster and gasbaggery, vowing to demolish the Great Satan and wipe Israel off the map, they dispatched Mr. Rouhani to dispense candy and flowers (and champagne, if they had any) to the gullible in the West. The sanctions are hurting, and like the pain of tight shoes, the pain of sanctions only worsens with time.
.
The gullibility of the West is the secret weapon of the mullahs — not only in Iran, but throughout the Muslim world. The mullahs, who are not above a little mild flirtation, string along presidents and prime ministers to make the inevitable snub all the more satisfying. Mr. Rouhani’s agents were pleased to go along with the minuet at the United Nations. They gave the White House a nudge and a wink, which the White House passed on to the gullible reporters, suggesting the time and place when and where Mr. Rouhani would acknowledge the deep bow that Mr. Obama always takes when he runs into a Muslim and reach for the American president’s proffered hand.
.
But it never happened. Anyone else could recognize a snub, but the ayatollahs knew their mark. They could count on Mr. Obama to make their excuses. “The Iranians have an internal dynamic that they have to manage,” an Obama aide told reporters.
.
That “internal dynamic” is the cultivated glee the ayatollahs take in insulting the Great Satan. This “internal dynamic” was on display the day before Mr. Rouhani left for New York and the United Nations. Flanked by his army’s chief of staff and the commander of the Revolutionary Guard, he presided over the annual parade of weapons through downtown Tehran. There was nothing sweet in sight. Banners on the trucks towing the Shahab-3 missiles, whose 800-mile range puts them within striking distance of both Israel and American bases in the Middle East, proclaimed that “America is not as powerful as it claims to be.” Another proclaimed that “Israel should cease to exist.” Not as sweet as the talk at Turtle Bay, but proof that nothing changes in Tehran.
.
Alas, nothing has changed in Washington, either. The president of the United States is as clueless as ever.
.
.
.
Wesley Pruden is editor emeritus of The Washington Times.
Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/sep/30/pruden-a-president-as-clueless-as-ever/#ixzz2gXOzWU9B
Sunday, September 29, 2013
SOME OF THE RINO DINOSAURS IN CONGRESS TESTED TOO MANY HELMETS IN 1912
!!!!
Testing football helmets in 1912
SENATOR TED CRUZ IS NOW A FORCE THE RINO SENATORS MUST RECKON WITH
!!!!
THE BAD BOY AT THE PARTY
By Wesley Pruden
Friday, September 27, 2013
.
Ted Cruz has been a bad boy, and deserves a good spanking. That’s the message his colleagues in the Senate, particularly his Republican colleagues, have been sending to him. They just couldn’t find anyone big enough to deliver the spanking, and now they never can.
.
His marathon speech — argument persists over whether it was a filibuster or merely filibluster — has established him as a force of nature in Washington, a star in a way that other senators only dream of. “The Cruz performance was great political theater,” says John Podhoretz of The New York Post. “If there had been any question before Tuesday about what a formidable presence he is going to be in Washington and in the Republican Party going forward, it has been laid to rest.”
.
What, after all, is politics about but theater? Who ever succeeded in politics but an actor? Some actors are just better at it than others. The Cruz phenomenon naturally irritates the senators who are content to be mere ushers in the theater, and never summon the courage to perform on the big stage. Or maybe it’s the circus, with a high wire above the clowns and no net. Once upon a time, and not so long ago, freshmen senators were like the small children in the orderly homes of the stuffy and the high-bred, to be seen but never heard. A freshman senator often waited a full year before making his maiden speech to the Senate, like a debutante waiting patiently to be presented to Society, ready for auction.
.
But the fresh crop of newcomers — Rand Paul of Kentucky, Marco Rubio of Florida, Ted Cruz of Texas — are children of the new age — noisy, rambunctious, impatient and impenitent, even. They’re not coming to town to carve out a sinecure, to be carried out feet first a quarter of a century later leaving no impression but the shape of their ample bottoms in an easy chair. They’re neither impressed by the ritual of “the world’s oldest deliberative body,” nor respectful of the ivy-encrusted tradition that binds it to the past. They’re contemptuous of all that. For better or worse, they’re coming only to do a job.
.
This same spunk and spirit spills over on to the freshmen class in the House, too. Tom Cotton of Arkansas, like Mr. Cruz a graduate of Harvard who escaped with the education without drowning in the left-wing moonshine, made his first House speeches before he even arrived in Washington to be sworn in, and announced before his first term was half over that he was already running to take a Senate seat away from the go-along-to-get-along incumbent Democrat next year.
.
Mr. Cruz sees things others don’t; some call this vision, others call it merely seeing visions, plural. He frightens those hanging on to the old order, and not just in the Senate.
.
Rep. Peter T. King of New York, an old-order Republican, is so angry that he splutters into semi-coherence. One minute he calls the Texas senator “a kamikaze pilot” and the next he puts him on a horse riding with the “Charge of the Light Brigade.” Or he’s “a medicine man selling goods that he knows are phony goods.”
.
Spluttering or not, he speaks for many in the Capitol Hill precinct (where Republicans and other conservatives never run well). “He’s not standing on principle,” Mr. King tells CNN. “I don’t know what he’s standing on. But he’s standing for a strategy that can’t work. It’s going to personally help him as far as his political status, but it’s going to be bad for the country, bad for the Republican Party. I’ve never seen anyone as unpopular in Republican circles as Ted Cruz.”
.
Who can doubt it? There are Republican circles, and there are Republican circles. They rarely overlap. Mr. King’s office was deluged with calls and email the minute Ted Cruz stepped away from the Senate floor after 21 hours, eager to make the men’s room his first stop. No one could get through by email or telephone to Sen. Mitch McConnell, the Republican leader, for hours. Sen. John McCain, who tweeted that he was watching a television sitcom, was inaccessible, his voicemail box full.
Obamacare is safe in the Senate. The blister and bluster has not changed a single vote.
.
In the House, the struggle turns to President Obama’s demand for another increase in the national debt. Speaker John A. Boehner and his not-so-merry men have an itemized list of what House approval will cost. The list includes a year’s delay in implementing Obamacare, construction of the Keystone pipeline, energy exploration on government lands, limits on medical malpractice and other things. If there’s a chance to get any of them, Ted Cruz’s grit and sand shows the way.
.
Wesley Pruden is editor emeritus of The Washington Times.
.
Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/sep/27/pruden-the-bad-boy-at-the-party/#ixzz2gIPZu8mM
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter
THE BAD BOY AT THE PARTY
By Wesley Pruden
Friday, September 27, 2013
.
Ted Cruz has been a bad boy, and deserves a good spanking. That’s the message his colleagues in the Senate, particularly his Republican colleagues, have been sending to him. They just couldn’t find anyone big enough to deliver the spanking, and now they never can.
.
His marathon speech — argument persists over whether it was a filibuster or merely filibluster — has established him as a force of nature in Washington, a star in a way that other senators only dream of. “The Cruz performance was great political theater,” says John Podhoretz of The New York Post. “If there had been any question before Tuesday about what a formidable presence he is going to be in Washington and in the Republican Party going forward, it has been laid to rest.”
.
What, after all, is politics about but theater? Who ever succeeded in politics but an actor? Some actors are just better at it than others. The Cruz phenomenon naturally irritates the senators who are content to be mere ushers in the theater, and never summon the courage to perform on the big stage. Or maybe it’s the circus, with a high wire above the clowns and no net. Once upon a time, and not so long ago, freshmen senators were like the small children in the orderly homes of the stuffy and the high-bred, to be seen but never heard. A freshman senator often waited a full year before making his maiden speech to the Senate, like a debutante waiting patiently to be presented to Society, ready for auction.
.
But the fresh crop of newcomers — Rand Paul of Kentucky, Marco Rubio of Florida, Ted Cruz of Texas — are children of the new age — noisy, rambunctious, impatient and impenitent, even. They’re not coming to town to carve out a sinecure, to be carried out feet first a quarter of a century later leaving no impression but the shape of their ample bottoms in an easy chair. They’re neither impressed by the ritual of “the world’s oldest deliberative body,” nor respectful of the ivy-encrusted tradition that binds it to the past. They’re contemptuous of all that. For better or worse, they’re coming only to do a job.
.
This same spunk and spirit spills over on to the freshmen class in the House, too. Tom Cotton of Arkansas, like Mr. Cruz a graduate of Harvard who escaped with the education without drowning in the left-wing moonshine, made his first House speeches before he even arrived in Washington to be sworn in, and announced before his first term was half over that he was already running to take a Senate seat away from the go-along-to-get-along incumbent Democrat next year.
.
Mr. Cruz sees things others don’t; some call this vision, others call it merely seeing visions, plural. He frightens those hanging on to the old order, and not just in the Senate.
.
Rep. Peter T. King of New York, an old-order Republican, is so angry that he splutters into semi-coherence. One minute he calls the Texas senator “a kamikaze pilot” and the next he puts him on a horse riding with the “Charge of the Light Brigade.” Or he’s “a medicine man selling goods that he knows are phony goods.”
.
Spluttering or not, he speaks for many in the Capitol Hill precinct (where Republicans and other conservatives never run well). “He’s not standing on principle,” Mr. King tells CNN. “I don’t know what he’s standing on. But he’s standing for a strategy that can’t work. It’s going to personally help him as far as his political status, but it’s going to be bad for the country, bad for the Republican Party. I’ve never seen anyone as unpopular in Republican circles as Ted Cruz.”
.
Who can doubt it? There are Republican circles, and there are Republican circles. They rarely overlap. Mr. King’s office was deluged with calls and email the minute Ted Cruz stepped away from the Senate floor after 21 hours, eager to make the men’s room his first stop. No one could get through by email or telephone to Sen. Mitch McConnell, the Republican leader, for hours. Sen. John McCain, who tweeted that he was watching a television sitcom, was inaccessible, his voicemail box full.
Obamacare is safe in the Senate. The blister and bluster has not changed a single vote.
.
In the House, the struggle turns to President Obama’s demand for another increase in the national debt. Speaker John A. Boehner and his not-so-merry men have an itemized list of what House approval will cost. The list includes a year’s delay in implementing Obamacare, construction of the Keystone pipeline, energy exploration on government lands, limits on medical malpractice and other things. If there’s a chance to get any of them, Ted Cruz’s grit and sand shows the way.
.
Wesley Pruden is editor emeritus of The Washington Times.
.
Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/sep/27/pruden-the-bad-boy-at-the-party/#ixzz2gIPZu8mM
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter
Saturday, September 28, 2013
IT IS TIME FOR THAT RINO DINOSAUR, JOHN McCAIN TO RETIRE
!!!!

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/09/27/McCain-Decries-the-GOP-Civil-War-He-Started
.
Obviously, McCain has been struck by a very bad case of "do as I say, not as I do."
After Sen. Rand Paul gave a 13-hour filibuster on the President's use of drones, Sen. McCain and his sub-altern Lindsey Graham took to the Senate floor to denounce Paul's speech. McCain even called Paul and his allies "wacko-birds" who were exerting too much influence in the upper chamber.
.
In the weeks leading up to the Senate vote on the continuing resolution, McCain and other Republicans made the rounds of the Sunday shows repeatedly to criticize Sen. Cruz. Although McCain likely wasn't involved, a Republican office followed his lead and forwarded opposition research on Sen. Cruz to Fox News' Chris Wallace.
.
After Cruz finished his marathon 22-hour floor speech against ObamaCare, McCain swiftly took to the floor with very sharp criticism of Cruz. There were no doubt many Republican Senators who disagreed with Cruz's tactic, yet they didn't feel a compulsion to engage in a very public fight with him.
.
Who, exactly, is being dysfunctional here?
.
These examples aren't isolated incidents. McCain has a long history of publicly lashing out at any Republicans who disagree with him. When he was advocating military intervention in Syria, he showed open disdain towards Republicans who questioned the wisdom of yet another foreign intervention, especially since it wasn't clear there were any good guys to back.
.
Any fissures in the GOP that exist would probably heal quickly if we could just somehow enforce an embargo on McCain appearing on Sunday news shows.
=======================================================================
COMMENTS:
Tom_
LetDemEatCake
rdman_VietVet
Tom_
Elmer Fruddricks
rdman_VietVet
McCain Decries the GOP Civil War He Started
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/09/27/McCain-Decries-the-GOP-Civil-War-He-Started
On Friday, Sen. John McCain indulged in his favorite pastime--going to the media and criticizing his fellow Republicans. Speaking to CBS, McCain said the GOP was "dysfunctional" and blamed Sens. Cruz and Lee for driving wedges between Republicans over their fight to defund ObamaCare.
"We are dividing the Republican party," McCain said. He continued, "I think that it argues for us to be more united and spend our time against our adversary because we all share the same principles and values and I’d like to see us do that.".
Obviously, McCain has been struck by a very bad case of "do as I say, not as I do."
After Sen. Rand Paul gave a 13-hour filibuster on the President's use of drones, Sen. McCain and his sub-altern Lindsey Graham took to the Senate floor to denounce Paul's speech. McCain even called Paul and his allies "wacko-birds" who were exerting too much influence in the upper chamber.
.
In the weeks leading up to the Senate vote on the continuing resolution, McCain and other Republicans made the rounds of the Sunday shows repeatedly to criticize Sen. Cruz. Although McCain likely wasn't involved, a Republican office followed his lead and forwarded opposition research on Sen. Cruz to Fox News' Chris Wallace.
.
After Cruz finished his marathon 22-hour floor speech against ObamaCare, McCain swiftly took to the floor with very sharp criticism of Cruz. There were no doubt many Republican Senators who disagreed with Cruz's tactic, yet they didn't feel a compulsion to engage in a very public fight with him.
.
Who, exactly, is being dysfunctional here?
.
These examples aren't isolated incidents. McCain has a long history of publicly lashing out at any Republicans who disagree with him. When he was advocating military intervention in Syria, he showed open disdain towards Republicans who questioned the wisdom of yet another foreign intervention, especially since it wasn't clear there were any good guys to back.
.
Any fissures in the GOP that exist would probably heal quickly if we could just somehow enforce an embargo on McCain appearing on Sunday news shows.
=======================================================================
COMMENTS:
Cruz stood up for what he was
elected to do. You stood up for obozo. I don't think you were elected
to do that. Time for you to go. Affer next years election yo will be
nothing more than a crusty old fool with no power and no position in the
party. Even the democrats will be done with you. To them you were
nothing but a useful idiot. You are a disgrace.
Like all old, menopausal
bulls and stallions, McLame attempts to invoke some animalistic primal
instinct to kill their younger, more 'robust' challengers... but no
matter how hard they try, the old studs ultimately lose or worse!
Pack it up, old man... you can't get it up anymore. Time for the Cottonwood, AZ pasture.
Pack it up, old man... you can't get it up anymore. Time for the Cottonwood, AZ pasture.
Isn't there a clause stating that when you're SENILE you can't be a SENATOR anymore?
-
rdman_VietVet Elmer Fruddricks
Don't get it??? Old males go 'manopausal' too... with their own unique symptoms and side effects. McShame is the poster-ole' boy for old 'manopausal' males!
-
Rose rdman_VietVet
What did you call it when he was THIS SAME PERSON WORKING FOR THE SAME DIM CAUSES, in the 60's and 70's???
-
rdman_VietVet Rose
I called it the same way as I'm calling it now. There are many Vets who know the real story of McShame's stay at the Hanoi Hilton.
-
Culprit rdman_VietVet
I think it's time for McCain to go also, but what is the so-called real story? I have heard these accusations before with no facts to back them up.
-
BTeboe Culprit
There comes a point where you really just need to go ahead and retire and enjoy the rest of your life. Get a hobby, go fishing, play golf, travel the world, spend time with your wife, kids and grandkids. It's time to hand the reins over to someone else. You've done your job, and you've served your country well, but you've outlived your usefullness. Retire already. Open letter to Senator John McCain-
-
-
-
-
-
Honorary JJJ44
Actually the North Vietnam treated the American POW very well because they expected to bargain with the USA. They dare not to do any harm to the American POW. McLame was an enept, incapable Air Force pilot, he damaged two planes and killed his co-pilot and landed in the hand of the Vietgong then he not need to fight until the war end and he was praised and held as hero, ugh.
If McLame was not too stupid, obama would never had a chance to win the election in 2008.
-
-
-
jerimiah69 BTeboe
Yes, he is lucky to be alive, I don't know that we are. He is too divisive and is too much aligned with liberals.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
rdman_VietVet Culprit
Following is a link that discusses both sides of the issue. You can make up your own mind.
However, there have been hundreds of anti-McCain Hero internet sites including statements from fellow POWs that have been scrubbed.
Then there were direct reports 'during' the Viet Nam conflict that corroborated the POWs allegations after they were released years later.
http://farfromglory.com/john_s...
-
Culprit rdman_VietVet
"All opinions
expressed on this page are those of Sen. Mche website you cite, Cain's supporters or his detractors, they are not the opinions of the webmaster or the Far From Glory
website. This page is for information purposes only." This disclaimer at the bottom of the website that you refer to, says it all. Hearsay and innuendos.
-
rdman_VietVet Culprit
You ignore that 'certain Viet Vets' had access to intelligence reports that came directly out of North Viet Nam that confirmed McShame's behavior at the Hanoi Hilton.
You also ignore the statements of fellow POWS, when they were released years later, that corroborated the real-time intelligence reports... all of which have been scrubbed &/or suspended.
McShame shares the company of Lurch Kerry and Jane Hanoi-Fonda... and recently, meeting with and supporting Al Qaeda affiliated terrorists in the act of invading sovereign nations... Tunisia, Libya, Egypt, Syria.
McShame, the fabricated hero, should have no standing whatsoever in the Congress of the USA or for that matter, in the USA!!
-
John OMalia rdman_VietVet
Never heard of any of these allegations at the time they were supposedly made. Most of those rumors are contemporaneous.
-
bill rdman_VietVet
RD.. if you don't have certifiable sources for your claim, you are but a pawn to those promoting denigration of an individual for reasons you've no clue. On another note.. .Me, my two brothers and my dad all served but we carry the burden/honor of our service to our country without some grandstand promotion of our service as you do with you potentially bogus screen name. I just returned from Honor Flight Rochester, Mission 30 with my dad and 44 other WWII veterans. During that weekend, I heard stories dad and his compatriots shared with each other that I'd never heard him speak of for almost 70 years. you on the other hand demean someone that has CERTIFIABLY served his country, was IMPRISONED for 5 years. So Rdman, put up or shut up.. DOS, Branch, MOS, Units, Locations. Otherwise, FU.
-
-
-
-
-
Caulfieldgirl Culprit
Between McCain's Daddy and himself, all McCain's files have been sealed by the Government. Even all his propaganda that he recorded while he was a prisoner of war....
-
-
Caulfieldgirl John OMalia
Why is Obama and McCain so buddy buddy? Don't you think Obama has not seen McCain's files?
-
-
-
-
sandra rdman_VietVet
He never talks about the corrupt CIA during Veitnam and you can damn sure bet he knows.
-
Rose rdman_VietVet
Well I know - you made my point! IF he wasn't "senile" THEN, and he's the SAME NOW, then what he's been all along is plain EVIL.
-
-
DeeBar rdman_VietVet
rdman , Same here . I never thought anyone getting shot down is a hero . I will say that staying with his buddies was admirable but then he knew his dad would look down on him for leaving as well as his fellow prisoners .
If I didn't know he was a (so called) Republican I'd think of him as a Progressive .
As a Combat Vet I know what a hero is and I've seen a bunch . He is not !
-
antheaura rdman_VietVet
...and what was the 'real story'? I just want him to get the hell out of our way! As far as I am concerned, they "turned" him, and now he is doing all he can to destroy the U.S.
-
-
-
-
NebraskaFilly Ahcma
Yes, but do you know how he came to BE in the Hanoi Hilton? He was shot down while NOT following his orders. On top of that, he sang like a canary and gave up FELLOW SOLDIERS!!!! He is and always has been a complete traitor!!!!!
-
Rose Ahcma
see moreYou've made a mistake and I grant an honest one.
At one time I had a dozen files on McCain filled to the MAXIMUM CAPACITY, EACH.
YOU research his POW years and these days, that takes going WELL below the surface. You will find the things he did that the MSM has worked hard to shut off any conversation about. Like WHY John McCain and John Kerry worked so hard together to get their two military records sealed, and buried a lot of POWS doing it, preventing a lot of MIA KIA answers also from coming forward.
He himself hasn't AS MUCH LIED about it as STONEWALLED and let people such as yourself STAUNCH the airing of his dirty laundry with a LOT of IGNORANT AND NON-INFORMED SUPPOSITIONS and SPECULATIONS.
PREVENTING a proper AIRING of McCain's AND Kerry's Military record AND THEIR CONGRESSIONAL CONDUCT TOWARDS THE MILITARY SINCE THEN.
PREVENTING some TRIALS for their CORRUPTION.
INCLUDING for things McCain did as a Pow.
In the CRASH of moral values and the anti-vietnam war "backlash" MSM CAMPAIGN for MARXIST GOALS all making it hard for JUSTIFIABLE MORAL CONCERNS to be investigated without being treated the same as so-called "BEDROOM POLICE, they know and CARE NOTHING of what military KNOWS is conduct UNBECOMING. What was prosecuted in others was also NOT prosecuted in McCain because he happens to be son and grandson of the FIRST Father/Son COMBO of 4 Star ADMIRALS, his father was Commander of the PACIFIC ARENA during Vietnam, and his grandfather the commander of the WWII carrier fleet arena. and there were several other of his grandfathers in TOP high command, in the Revolution, and the Civil War.
They weren't about to let this disastrous Lt go down in flames, no matter what destruction he wrecked on the Navy, on our military goals, how many lives were lost and forever crippled by his brash and rebellious conduct. No matter how many inconsistent lies he told about his own conduct.
You may find 1 or 2 dozen Vietnam Vets who say they admire him. But you cross this land and you'll have a hard time out of the VFW halls finding VIETNAM VETS or anyone dealing much with the VA and VA MEDICAL services who wouldn't vote in a jury box for him to be hanged for Treason.
You may want to discount THIS SITE, which I do myself, totally, but you investigate the names AND EARNED REPUTATIONS of the Military personnel in this article, the background stories of which used to be READILY AVAILABLE and are only left in sites such as this one NOW because the name of the site itself DISREPUTES the FACTS in the article. But I'm 62, the age of the bottom rung of Vietnam Veterans - and I've heard these stories on McCain from great men, all my adult life. Mostly from the men themselves in live TV interviews, and NOW-SCRUBBED SITES that were put up by these men themselves saying exactly what they said in the camera interviews.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/...
"JOHN McCAIN IS NO HERO!"
A special commentary by UnfitMcCain.com's editor, Hugh E. Scott
I haven't always disrespected Senator McCain. Quite the contrary, because I'm a Vietnam veteran, ex-Air Force pilot and lifelong registered Republican, he used to be a big hero of mine.
My feelings changed in May 2008, when I began investigating "swift boating" rumors about his POW record. During the facts-check, I ran across an article about John by the late Colonel David Hackworth, a much-decorated career Army officer, Vietnam combat legend and popular TV guest commentator Colonel Hackworth.
In 25 years of active military service, which spanned the Korean and Vietnam conflicts, "Hack" received 78 combat awards, including the Silver Star, Distinguished Flying Cross, Bronze Star with "V," Air Medal and eight Purple Hearts.
Before his death in 2005 from cancer, Col. Hackworth wrote the following:
John McCain is being hailed by the press as a "genuine war hero." But is he a war hero in the conventional sense like Audie Murphy and John Glenn? Or is his "war hero" status the creation of a very slick publicity campaign that plays on flag, duty, honor and country?
-
Ahcma Rose
I never said he was a war hero. I said he was a POW. You've said a lot of words without giving out any facts. Since DailyKos is a left wing media group, I take whatever they say with a grain of salt. Medal of Honor winner Col Bud Day, (who passed away recently) has ALWAYS supported the fact that John McCain was a POW. Why??? Because he was his roommate at the Hanoi HIlton. Are you going to say he was a liar and supported these supposed lies???
-
Rose Ahcma
see moreI told you Kos' record before I posted the link. But the INFORMATION I gave you is INDIVIDUAL NAMES of REAL HEROES who told the truth about McCain, and that is a SOURCE ANYONE CAN USE to chase down the real truth about McCain.Bud Day doesn't have to support the FACT THAT McCAIN WAS A POW - EVERYONE KNOWS HE WAS. His father was the ARENA COMMANDER AT THE TIME he went down. You cannot take Col. David Hackworth's reputation and testimony with a grain of salt. HIS reputation was no FALSE ATTRIBUTION by political well-wishers who needed Day to prop up others. Just because you don't know beans about the military doesn't mean that everyone else can't figure out how YOUR story unravels JUST ON THOSE FACTs. The names of the prisoners were given to the Military, the State Dept. and RED CROSS by the North Viet Cong within DAYS of their capture. When things are plainly see by the world like McCain lighting up cigarettes while a POW, EVERY MILITARY MAN IN THE WORLD knows his father's SHAME.
You can lionize Col Bud Day, but you cannot trash the hundreds and thousands of other Vietnam Veterans who EARNED their stripes and their credentials. Dims and RINOS have tried, for the sake of the likes of McCain and Kerry.
But the VOTING RECORDS of both McCain and Kerry back the CHARACTER PICTURE of these mens' REPUTATIONS among Service Men.
Men of the character that Bud Day PAINTED would never has shoved the mother of Mia/Kia/Pow out of her wheelchair on the Senate floor in a publicity stunt that hit the air in the day it occurred much like Benghazi did - we just didn't have the means in those days to build the conflagration backlash we can do these days.
And the SCRUBBING over that incident is unbelievable, hiding yet another Viet Cong massacre and that of our USA MILITARY'S best South Vietnamese allies - 800-900 thousand destitute villagers and farmers - all for John Kerry's family business venture in South Vietnam WITH the North Viet Cong.
Bud Day cannot dismantle the TRUTH.
Another like it is "Wet Start" McCain's excuses for transferring off the USS Forrestal instantly after the fire.
-
-
-
Rose OceanGram
Everyone who WANTS to has this stuff on McCain. Anyone who got curious about McCain fighting Reagan, helping Clinton, SIDING with TED KENNEDY and then HANOI JOHN had to start digging, IF THEY DID NOT ALREADY KNOW from reading the biographies of Vietnam HEROES. Back in the 80's, wondering how he could vote anti-military, shaming his dad and grandfather...
John Kerry's foot soldiers stoled Winter Soldier from the public libraries, and tons is scrubbed back off the internet, about both of them, and too many of the Vietnam Heroes have passed away, but their hardback books exist, and the remaining Vietnam Vets and those who have known them well all still have memories that may take some stirring, but it can still be pieced together.
-
-
-
-
-
AlmostaCowboy Rose
Didn't say anything, genius + the 9 up-voters. was a POW until 1973. He He was first elected to public office in 1983.
Morons.
-
-
Richard Haley rdman_VietVet
No he is not. He is most definitely worse than an old menopausal male.
To me, he is showing the preliminary signs of the onslaught of dementia.
-
antheaura rdman_VietVet
Then they should have chunked the old bat Pelosi a LOOONG time ago, and get ready to put the cuffs on hillary, because BOTH need to go. And that's just the VERY SHORT list!
-
-
-
2SUTHRN digitalPimple
^ Haha! ! ! ! ! :-) That's the funniest thing I've seen all week. Thank you for the laugh...about spit my drink out from laughing so hard.
Funds should go towards a Tea Party challenger in the primary. Remove the senile old POS once and for all. I can respect his service as a fellow military member but hate the way he is helping destroy the Republican Party.
-
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)