Saturday, September 28, 2013

IT IS TIME FOR THAT RINO DINOSAUR, JOHN McCAIN TO RETIRE

!!!!

McCain Decries the GOP Civil War He Started

 




http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/09/27/McCain-Decries-the-GOP-Civil-War-He-Started

On Friday, Sen. John McCain indulged in his favorite pastime--going to the media and criticizing his fellow Republicans. Speaking to CBS, McCain said the GOP was "dysfunctional" and blamed Sens. Cruz and Lee for driving wedges between Republicans over their fight to defund ObamaCare. 

"We are dividing the Republican party," McCain said. He continued, "I think that it argues for us to be more united and spend our time against our adversary because we all share the same principles and values and I’d like to see us do that."
.
Obviously, McCain has been struck by a very bad case of "do as I say, not as I do."
After Sen. Rand Paul gave a 13-hour filibuster on the President's use of drones, Sen. McCain and his sub-altern Lindsey Graham took to the Senate floor to denounce Paul's speech. McCain even called Paul and his allies "wacko-birds" who were exerting too much influence in the upper chamber.
.

In the weeks leading up to the Senate vote on the continuing resolution, McCain and other Republicans made the rounds of the Sunday shows repeatedly to criticize Sen. Cruz. Although McCain likely wasn't involved, a Republican office followed his lead and forwarded opposition research on Sen. Cruz to Fox News' Chris Wallace.

.

After Cruz finished his marathon 22-hour floor speech against ObamaCare, McCain swiftly took to the floor with very sharp criticism of Cruz. There were no doubt many Republican Senators who disagreed with Cruz's tactic, yet they didn't feel a compulsion to engage in a very public fight with him.

.

Who, exactly, is being dysfunctional here?

.

These examples aren't isolated incidents. McCain has a long history of publicly lashing out at any Republicans who disagree with him. When he was advocating military intervention in Syria, he showed open disdain towards Republicans who questioned the wisdom of yet another foreign intervention, especially since it wasn't clear there were any good guys to back.

.

Any fissures in the GOP that exist would probably heal quickly if we could just somehow enforce an embargo on McCain appearing on Sunday news shows.

=======================================================================


COMMENTS:


Tom_ LetDemEatCake

Cruz stood up for what he was elected to do. You stood up for obozo. I don't think you were elected to do that. Time for you to go. Affer next years election yo will be nothing more than a crusty old fool with no power and no position in the party. Even the democrats will be done with you. To them you were nothing but a useful idiot. You are a disgrace.


rdman_VietVet Tom_

Like all old, menopausal bulls and stallions, McLame attempts to invoke some animalistic primal instinct to kill their younger, more 'robust' challengers... but no matter how hard they try, the old studs ultimately lose or worse!
Pack it up, old man... you can't get it up anymore. Time for the Cottonwood, AZ pasture.


Elmer Fruddricks rdman_VietVet

Isn't there a clause stating that when you're SENILE you can't be a SENATOR anymore?


  • rdman_VietVet Elmer Fruddricks

    Don't get it??? Old males go 'manopausal' too... with their own unique symptoms and side effects. McShame is the poster-ole' boy for old 'manopausal' males!


    • Rose rdman_VietVet

      What did you call it when he was THIS SAME PERSON WORKING FOR THE SAME DIM CAUSES, in the 60's and 70's???


      • rdman_VietVet Rose

        I called it the same way as I'm calling it now. There are many Vets who know the real story of McShame's stay at the Hanoi Hilton.


        • Culprit rdman_VietVet

          I think it's time for McCain to go also, but what is the so-called real story? I have heard these accusations before with no facts to back them up.


          • BTeboe Culprit

            There comes a point where you really just need to go ahead and retire and enjoy the rest of your life. Get a hobby, go fishing, play golf, travel the world, spend time with your wife, kids and grandkids. It's time to hand the reins over to someone else. You've done your job, and you've served your country well, but you've outlived your usefullness. Retire already. Open letter to Senator John McCain-


          • rdman_VietVet Culprit

            Following is a link that discusses both sides of the issue. You can make up your own mind.
            However, there have been hundreds of anti-McCain Hero internet sites including statements from fellow POWs that have been scrubbed.
            Then there were direct reports 'during' the Viet Nam conflict that corroborated the POWs allegations after they were released years later.
            http://farfromglory.com/john_s...


            • Culprit rdman_VietVet

              "All opinions
              expressed on this page are those of Sen. Mche website you cite, Cain's supporters or his detractors, they are not the opinions of the webmaster or the Far From Glory
              website. This page is for information purposes only." This disclaimer at the bottom of the website that you refer to, says it all. Hearsay and innuendos.


              • rdman_VietVet Culprit

                You ignore that 'certain Viet Vets' had access to intelligence reports that came directly out of North Viet Nam that confirmed McShame's behavior at the Hanoi Hilton.
                You also ignore the statements of fellow POWS, when they were released years later, that corroborated the real-time intelligence reports... all of which have been scrubbed &/or suspended.
                McShame shares the company of Lurch Kerry and Jane Hanoi-Fonda... and recently, meeting with and supporting Al Qaeda affiliated terrorists in the act of invading sovereign nations... Tunisia, Libya, Egypt, Syria.
                McShame, the fabricated hero, should have no standing whatsoever in the Congress of the USA or for that matter, in the USA!!


                • John OMalia rdman_VietVet

                  Never heard of any of these allegations at the time they were supposedly made. Most of those rumors are contemporaneous.


                • bill rdman_VietVet

                  RD.. if you don't have certifiable sources for your claim, you are but a pawn to those promoting denigration of an individual for reasons you've no clue. On another note.. .Me, my two brothers and my dad all served but we carry the burden/honor of our service to our country without some grandstand promotion of our service as you do with you potentially bogus screen name. I just returned from Honor Flight Rochester, Mission 30 with my dad and 44 other WWII veterans. During that weekend, I heard stories dad and his compatriots shared with each other that I'd never heard him speak of for almost 70 years. you on the other hand demean someone that has CERTIFIABLY served his country, was IMPRISONED for 5 years. So Rdman, put up or shut up.. DOS, Branch, MOS, Units, Locations. Otherwise, FU.


          • Herb Culprit

            real story is, the commie bastards did a good job at re-programmng ol' John McCain. Proof is in the pudding.


          • One of We Culprit

            Songbird


          • Caulfieldgirl Culprit

            Between McCain's Daddy and himself, all McCain's files have been sealed by the Government. Even all his propaganda that he recorded while he was a prisoner of war....


        • sandra rdman_VietVet

          He never talks about the corrupt CIA during Veitnam and you can damn sure bet he knows.


        • Rose rdman_VietVet

          Well I know - you made my point! IF he wasn't "senile" THEN, and he's the SAME NOW, then what he's been all along is plain EVIL.


        • michigan1209 rdman_VietVet

          Sid 'the canary of Hanoi' McCain !


        • DeeBar rdman_VietVet

          rdman , Same here . I never thought anyone getting shot down is a hero . I will say that staying with his buddies was admirable but then he knew his dad would look down on him for leaving as well as his fellow prisoners .
          If I didn't know he was a (so called) Republican I'd think of him as a Progressive .
          As a Combat Vet I know what a hero is and I've seen a bunch . He is not !


        • antheaura rdman_VietVet

          ...and what was the 'real story'? I just want him to get the hell out of our way! As far as I am concerned, they "turned" him, and now he is doing all he can to destroy the U.S.


      • michigan1209 Rose

        TRAITOR ? Perhaps ?


      • Ahcma Rose

        While I don't care for McCain, do some research. McCain in the late 60's and early 70's was in a Vietnam Prisioner of War Camp called the Hanoi Hilton. The only cause he was working on was to survive and live.


        • NebraskaFilly Ahcma

          Yes, but do you know how he came to BE in the Hanoi Hilton? He was shot down while NOT following his orders. On top of that, he sang like a canary and gave up FELLOW SOLDIERS!!!! He is and always has been a complete traitor!!!!!


        • Rose Ahcma

          You've made a mistake and I grant an honest one.
          At one time I had a dozen files on McCain filled to the MAXIMUM CAPACITY, EACH.
          YOU research his POW years and these days, that takes going WELL below the surface. You will find the things he did that the MSM has worked hard to shut off any conversation about. Like WHY John McCain and John Kerry worked so hard together to get their two military records sealed, and buried a lot of POWS doing it, preventing a lot of MIA KIA answers also from coming forward.
          He himself hasn't AS MUCH LIED about it as STONEWALLED and let people such as yourself STAUNCH the airing of his dirty laundry with a LOT of IGNORANT AND NON-INFORMED SUPPOSITIONS and SPECULATIONS.
          PREVENTING a proper AIRING of McCain's AND Kerry's Military record AND THEIR CONGRESSIONAL CONDUCT TOWARDS THE MILITARY SINCE THEN.
          PREVENTING some TRIALS for their CORRUPTION.
          INCLUDING for things McCain did as a Pow.
          In the CRASH of moral values and the anti-vietnam war "backlash" MSM CAMPAIGN for MARXIST GOALS all making it hard for JUSTIFIABLE MORAL CONCERNS to be investigated without being treated the same as so-called "BEDROOM POLICE, they know and CARE NOTHING of what military KNOWS is conduct UNBECOMING. What was prosecuted in others was also NOT prosecuted in McCain because he happens to be son and grandson of the FIRST Father/Son COMBO of 4 Star ADMIRALS, his father was Commander of the PACIFIC ARENA during Vietnam, and his grandfather the commander of the WWII carrier fleet arena. and there were several other of his grandfathers in TOP high command, in the Revolution, and the Civil War.
          They weren't about to let this disastrous Lt go down in flames, no matter what destruction he wrecked on the Navy, on our military goals, how many lives were lost and forever crippled by his brash and rebellious conduct. No matter how many inconsistent lies he told about his own conduct.
          You may find 1 or 2 dozen Vietnam Vets who say they admire him. But you cross this land and you'll have a hard time out of the VFW halls finding VIETNAM VETS or anyone dealing much with the VA and VA MEDICAL services who wouldn't vote in a jury box for him to be hanged for Treason.
          You may want to discount THIS SITE, which I do myself, totally, but you investigate the names AND EARNED REPUTATIONS of the Military personnel in this article, the background stories of which used to be READILY AVAILABLE and are only left in sites such as this one NOW because the name of the site itself DISREPUTES the FACTS in the article. But I'm 62, the age of the bottom rung of Vietnam Veterans - and I've heard these stories on McCain from great men, all my adult life. Mostly from the men themselves in live TV interviews, and NOW-SCRUBBED SITES that were put up by these men themselves saying exactly what they said in the camera interviews.
          http://www.dailykos.com/story/...
          "JOHN McCAIN IS NO HERO!"
          A special commentary by UnfitMcCain.com's editor, Hugh E. Scott
          I haven't always disrespected Senator McCain. Quite the contrary, because I'm a Vietnam veteran, ex-Air Force pilot and lifelong registered Republican, he used to be a big hero of mine.
          My feelings changed in May 2008, when I began investigating "swift boating" rumors about his POW record. During the facts-check, I ran across an article about John by the late Colonel David Hackworth, a much-decorated career Army officer, Vietnam combat legend and popular TV guest commentator Colonel Hackworth.
          In 25 years of active military service, which spanned the Korean and Vietnam conflicts, "Hack" received 78 combat awards, including the Silver Star, Distinguished Flying Cross, Bronze Star with "V," Air Medal and eight Purple Hearts.
          Before his death in 2005 from cancer, Col. Hackworth wrote the following:
          John McCain is being hailed by the press as a "genuine war hero." But is he a war hero in the conventional sense like Audie Murphy and John Glenn? Or is his "war hero" status the creation of a very slick publicity campaign that plays on flag, duty, honor and country?
          see more


          • Ahcma Rose

            I never said he was a war hero. I said he was a POW. You've said a lot of words without giving out any facts. Since DailyKos is a left wing media group, I take whatever they say with a grain of salt. Medal of Honor winner Col Bud Day, (who passed away recently) has ALWAYS supported the fact that John McCain was a POW. Why??? Because he was his roommate at the Hanoi HIlton. Are you going to say he was a liar and supported these supposed lies???


            • Rose Ahcma

              I told you Kos' record before I posted the link. But the INFORMATION I gave you is INDIVIDUAL NAMES of REAL HEROES who told the truth about McCain, and that is a SOURCE ANYONE CAN USE to chase down the real truth about McCain.Bud Day doesn't have to support the FACT THAT McCAIN WAS A POW - EVERYONE KNOWS HE WAS. His father was the ARENA COMMANDER AT THE TIME he went down. You cannot take Col. David Hackworth's reputation and testimony with a grain of salt. HIS reputation was no FALSE ATTRIBUTION by political well-wishers who needed Day to prop up others. Just because you don't know beans about the military doesn't mean that everyone else can't figure out how YOUR story unravels JUST ON THOSE FACTs. The names of the prisoners were given to the Military, the State Dept. and RED CROSS by the North Viet Cong within DAYS of their capture. When things are plainly see by the world like McCain lighting up cigarettes while a POW, EVERY MILITARY MAN IN THE WORLD knows his father's SHAME.
              You can lionize Col Bud Day, but you cannot trash the hundreds and thousands of other Vietnam Veterans who EARNED their stripes and their credentials. Dims and RINOS have tried, for the sake of the likes of McCain and Kerry.
              But the VOTING RECORDS of both McCain and Kerry back the CHARACTER PICTURE of these mens' REPUTATIONS among Service Men.
              Men of the character that Bud Day PAINTED would never has shoved the mother of Mia/Kia/Pow out of her wheelchair on the Senate floor in a publicity stunt that hit the air in the day it occurred much like Benghazi did - we just didn't have the means in those days to build the conflagration backlash we can do these days.
              And the SCRUBBING over that incident is unbelievable, hiding yet another Viet Cong massacre and that of our USA MILITARY'S best South Vietnamese allies - 800-900 thousand destitute villagers and farmers - all for John Kerry's family business venture in South Vietnam WITH the North Viet Cong.
              Bud Day cannot dismantle the TRUTH.
              Another like it is "Wet Start" McCain's excuses for transferring off the USS Forrestal instantly after the fire.
              see more


          • OceanGram Rose

            OH , so that's what Obama has on Mc Cain...I knew he had to have something on him for him to betray the constitution and the conservative party..the old son of a b..t ...ch


            • Rose OceanGram

              Everyone who WANTS to has this stuff on McCain. Anyone who got curious about McCain fighting Reagan, helping Clinton, SIDING with TED KENNEDY and then HANOI JOHN had to start digging, IF THEY DID NOT ALREADY KNOW from reading the biographies of Vietnam HEROES. Back in the 80's, wondering how he could vote anti-military, shaming his dad and grandfather...
              John Kerry's foot soldiers stoled Winter Soldier from the public libraries, and tons is scrubbed back off the internet, about both of them, and too many of the Vietnam Heroes have passed away, but their hardback books exist, and the remaining Vietnam Vets and those who have known them well all still have memories that may take some stirring, but it can still be pieced together.


        • Doug White Ahcma

          NOT TRUE


      • AlmostaCowboy Rose

        Didn't say anything, genius + the 9 up-voters. was a POW until 1973. He He was first elected to public office in 1983.
        Morons.


    • Richard Haley rdman_VietVet

      No he is not. He is most definitely worse than an old menopausal male.
      To me, he is showing the preliminary signs of the onslaught of dementia.


    • antheaura rdman_VietVet

      Then they should have chunked the old bat Pelosi a LOOONG time ago, and get ready to put the cuffs on hillary, because BOTH need to go. And that's just the VERY SHORT list!


  • digitalPimple Elmer Fruddricks

    here -- someone is trying:
    http://www.gofundme.com/4jizo0


    • 2SUTHRN digitalPimple

      ^ Haha! ! ! ! ! :-) That's the funniest thing I've seen all week. Thank you for the laugh...about spit my drink out from laughing so hard.
      Funds should go towards a Tea Party challenger in the primary. Remove the senile old POS once and for all. I can respect his service as a fellow military member but hate the way he is helping destroy the Republican Party.





Thursday, September 26, 2013

TERRY McAULIFFE IS ABLE TO SHOVEL DIRT EVEN WITHOUT A SHOVEL

!!!!

Terry McAuliffe and Ken Cucinelli
.
.
.

September 26, 2013
.
If You Missed Last Night's Virginia Gubernatorial Debate . . . Good for You!
.
.

So why did Terry McAuliffe run for governor?
His main job since the mid-1990s has been to be Bill Clinton's buddy. There's nothing inherently wrong with that -- you get to play a lot of golf, meet a lot of wealthy, interesting people, and people are eager to do business with you, because they figure someday you'll invite them to hang around with the president and Hillary, too. (Yes, McAuliffe was DNC Chair for his party's sterling period from 2001 to 2005.) Consciously or not, he's like Doug Band -- selling, or at least trading access to the former president and the likely 2012 Democratic presidential candidate.

.

Terry McAuliffe has never been a policy wonk. He's a passionate partisan -- again, nothing inherently wrong with that; functioning political parties need passionate partisans to work in their ranks, fire up the crowd, and raise the money. But his political philosophy is simply, "my guys are right, and the other guys are wrong." It's hard to find a time he strongly disagreed with his own party; he apparently disagreed with his party on gun control back when he was DNC Chair, but his opposition didn't seem to have much influence or effect. And now he's running on gun control this year, calculating that stance will help him more in the D.C. suburbs than it will hurt him downstate.

.

Every time McAuliffe whiffs a candidate event because he didn't do the homework, it confirms the suspicion that McAuliffe wants the job of governor . . . just because he wants to be taken seriously, and not just seen as "the money guy." But apparently he doesn't want the job badly enough to actually study the issues.

.

Wednesday night's debate offered lines and arguments that are extremely familiar -- hell, let's just say, exhaustingly tired and worn out -- to anyone who's been paying attention to this race.
McAuliffe, who has spent his life's work as a Democratic party fundraiser and operative, pitched himself as the voice of bipartisanship in Virginia. He, who has done more to connect wealthy donors and lawmakers than perhaps any other man in American history, lambasted his rival for taking $18,000 in gifts from a wealthy owner of a medical supplement company. He, who has dumped a large fortune on negative ads, decried the negative tone of the campaign. McAuliffe, who spent much of 2012 insisting Mitt Romney had to release his tax returns, said he had done enough by releasing summaries of his finances for the past few years.

.

But McAuliffe was able to hide his not-gonna-worry-about-the-details approach to policy for most of the night. Debates only require candidates to remember a couple of talking points on each issue, and Terry McAuliffe can do that quite well. You can almost see him checking the boxes in his mind: Nanotechnology, community colleges, invest in education… mention the family… "His tax cuts will mean financial ruin for the state." We need to invest. Invest. Invest, invest, invest.

.

Credit where it's due, McAuliffe avoided lapsing into old habits and telling voters they could qualify for an HB-5 visa if they invested $500,000 in GreenTech Automotive.

.

But I can see why Ken Cuccinelli is trailing this race. His persona on the stump is even-keeled to the point of boredom. I suspect that if any undecided voters were tuned in to NBC at 7 p.m. last night, they found Cuccinelli robot-like, reminiscent of the early Mitt Romney models.

.

I wasn't thrilled with Cuccinelli's answer on why he accepted $18,000 in gifts from Johnny Williams. Cuccinelli emphasized that he realized he had failed to report the gifts and alerted state authorities, and asked whether anyone believed McAuliffe would do the same in those circumstances.

.

But most of us will never get a gift, or a group of gifts, worth $18,000 from someone we don't know that well, or even from our closest of friends. McAuliffe's gift attack suggests to low-information voters that Cuccinelli works in a world where fabulously wealthy well-connected businessmen and grifters throw around money to ensure government policies protect their interests -- which is pretty much the world of McAuliffe's entire adult life.

Tuesday, September 24, 2013

SHOOTERS GO WHERE PEOPLE DO NOT CARRY GUNS

!!!!


Gun Myths

 

By JASON L. RILEY

 

THE WALL STREET JOURNAL ONLINE

24 SEPTEMBER 13

.

.

.

 

Back in March, the Pew Research Center polled the following question: "Compared with 20 years ago, has the number of gun crimes in America gone up, gone down or stayed the same?
.
Just 12% responded correctly that gun crimes had fallen in the past two decades, while some 55% thought they had risen. That wide misperception could be due to the fact that the liberal media, which has its own anti-gun agenda, has done a poor job of educating the public. It also might result from the fact that mass shootings, such as the one this month at the Navy Ship Yard in Washington, have been on the rise.
.
"Massacres grab headlines, and so may explain why many Americans believe, incorrectly, that gun crime is on the rise," reports the Economist magazine. "In fact, gun murders have fallen by half in the past 20 years, in line with a general decline in crime."
.
But why are there more mass shootings these days? One theory is the proliferation of public areas where guns are outlawed. "Since 1950, almost every single public shooting in the United States in which more than three people have been killed has taken place in what are commonly known as 'gun-free zones,'" reports the Washington Examiner. Recent shootings at schools and movie theaters illustrate this point. The Navy Yard shooting is another example. A policy implemented 20 years ago effectively banned people other than security guards from carrying guns on military bases.
.
The shooters go where it's less likely that someone will fire back.

Monday, September 23, 2013

CREEPING SOCIALISM IS SPREAD ACROSS THE NATION, SPAWN OF OBAMAISM

!!!!

Contentions

Oh To Be Young and Socialist Again

If the polls are correct, in less than two months New York City will elect Bill de Blasio as its next mayor. A doctrinaire liberal, his impending victory seems to be, as Seth noted last month, the return of the Dinkins Democrats to power in New York after 20 years of Rudy Giuliani and Michael Bloomberg. De Blasio’s left-wing populism and hostility to both the business community and the police tactics that have helped fuel New York’s revival bode ill for the city’s future. But today’s New York Times gives us further insight into de Blasio that gives new meaning to the stories indicating that Gotham’s political balance of power is lurching to the hard left.
.

In an effort to gain further insight to the Democratic primary winner’s character, the Times takes us back to de Blasio’s misspent youth when he was no limousine liberal but rather a full-blown hardcore leftist who traveled to Nicaragua to support the Marxist Sandinista government. Even before traveling to Central America, the Times tells us the future mayor had no doubts about his goal for society:

Mr. de Blasio became an ardent supporter of the Nicaraguan revolutionaries. He helped raise funds for the Sandinistas in New York and subscribed to the party’s newspaper, Barricada, or Barricade. When he was asked at a meeting in 1990 about his goals for society, he said he was an advocate of “democratic socialism.”

Of course, De Blasio characterizes his views differently today, calling himself a “progressive” and saying merely that seeing the Sandinistas up close merely motivated him to see that the government protects the poor. While he now says he disapproved of the suppression of dissenting views by the Marxist tyrants he backed so fervently, then it was a different story. Nor did he seem terribly interested in supporting human rights when he chose to spend his honeymoon in Communist Cuba, a decision that his daughter told the New York Daily News she thinks is “badass”—which is her way of saying she approves of the choice.

.
There will be those who say that none of this tells us much about the choices New York faces today and they will have a point. As George W. Bush used to say, “When I was young and irresponsible, I was young and irresponsible.” But the romantic gloss that is being applied to this portion of de Blasio’s biography tells us a lot not only about him but also about the revisionist history that is the foundation for this story.


.
Any attempt to refight the political wars of the 1980s may be a futile endeavor, but the willingness of the press to allow de Blasio to paint his support for the Sandinistas as part of the journey that led him to the mayoralty bodes ill for the city. That’s not just because the Sandinista cause was largely discredited when they were finally forced by the stalemate in the fighting to face the people of Nicaragua in a democratic election. Their defeat at the polls vindicated the efforts of the Reagan and George H.W. Bush administrations to support the rebels who resisted the Marxists and exposed the group’s supporters like de Blasio as fronts for Communist killers.

.
That may not be a disqualifying attribute to many New York voters, but it ought to give pause to those whose livelihoods and safety will depend on de Blasio and the wrecking crew he brings to City Hall next January not demolishing all that Giuliani and Bloomberg accomplished in the last 20 years.
To those who are either too young or too deluded by liberal propaganda to know better, the struggle against the socialism that de Blasio backed was the most important battle fought in the last half of the 20th century. Those who aimed at stopping socialism were not trying to hurt the poor; they were defending human rights against a political cause that sacrificed more than 100 million victims on the Marxist altar.

.
The verdict of history was delivered as the Berlin Wall fell and the “socialist motherland” collapsed, and along with it much of the ideological house of cards that liberals had built as they sought to discredit or defeat anti-Communists. It says a lot about de Blasio’s commitment to that vicious political faith that even after the Iron Curtain fell and the peoples of captive Eastern Europe celebrated the defeat of the Communist cause that he would make a pilgrimage to one of its last strongholds in Cuba to celebrate his marriage.

.
If de Blasio were willing to admit that much of what he said in defense of the Sandinistas and Cuba was wrong, there would be nothing to say now about his past other than to state that he had learned from it. But since he appears to be proud of his support for tyrants, it is fair game for his critics. More to the point, it is also worth asking just how much those experiences still influence a politician who will have at his disposal the vast powers of the mayoralty.

Saturday, September 21, 2013

BENEDICT ARNOLD'S PROGENY LIVE WITH US TODAY

!!!!




September 21st
Benedict Arnold Commits Treason
On September 21, 1780, General Benedict Arnold betrayed his country when he gave the British information that could allow them to capture the American fort at West Point on the Hudson River in New York.

At the time, Americans regarded Arnold as a hero for his bravery in the Revolutionary War. He had fought with daring skill at Fort Ticonderoga, Quebec, Valcour Island, and Saratoga. But he grew resentful at promotions other officers received, and he hungered for money to support the lifestyle he enjoyed with his young wife, the beautiful young Peggy Shippen. Arnold began exchanging secret messages with the enemy, offering betrayal in exchange for money and high rank in the British army.

On the night of September 21, he sealed the traitorous deal when he met with Major John André, aide to the commander of all British forces in North America, and handed him detailed information on West Point, which Arnold commanded. Arnold returned to the fort while André, disguised in civilian’s clothes, made his way toward the British lines.

Two days later, Patriot militiamen stopped André and were shocked to discover who he was—and that he carried details about West Point in his boots, including some papers in Arnold’s handwriting. Arnold was at breakfast when he received word of André’s capture. He quickly excused himself, boarded his barge, and escaped to a British warship anchored in the Hudson—aptly named HMS Vulture.

Arnold fought for the British for the rest of the Revolution, leading troops that burned Richmond, Virginia, and New London, Connecticut. After the war he went to England, where he died in 1801, scorned by many even there. Like almost all traitors, Arnold acted not for any ideals, but for personal gain, and he earned himself the most infamous name in American history.                                                                                                                                                                                    - BILL BENNETT               









Friday, September 20, 2013

THE TRAVIS COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY SHOULD BE DISBARRED FOR HIS PERSECUTION OF TOM DeLAY

!!!!

Texas Appeals Court Reverses Tom DeLay's 2010 Conviction


AUSTIN, Texas—An appellate court on Thursday reversed former Republican House Majority Leader Tom DeLay's 2010 conviction on money laundering.
Associated Press

Former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay on Thursday in Washington
Mr. DeLay had been found guilty of channeling $190,000 in corporate political donations to Republicans running for the Texas Legislature in 2002 as he helped a push to redraw congressional district lines in the state. Texas election law prohibits corporate campaign contributions to state candidates.

.
But the Texas appellate court in Austin overturned the verdict and acquitted Mr. Delay. He faced a three-year prison term, though he has been free on bond while appealing his conviction.
"I just thank the Lord for carrying me through all this," Mr. DeLay said in Washington. He said he had been praying Thursday with a group of men trying to mount a national prayer effort when "my lawyer calls and says, 'You're a free man.' "

 .
The Austin-based Travis County District Attorney's Office, which brought the case, said it "strongly" disagreed with the opinion, adding that appellate judges "substituted their assessment of the facts for that of 12 jurors who personally heard the testimony of over 40 witnesses over the course of several weeks." The office said it would appeal the ruling.

.
Mr. DeLay, who left Congress in 2006, and his legal team have long claimed that the prosecution was a political witch hunt brought against him because of his political prowess.
"Regardless of what you think about Tom, at the end of the day he did not violate a rule or law that should have exposed him to the prosecution and persecution he has been exposed to over the last decade," said Mr. DeLay's appellate lawyer, Brian Wice. He said the conviction devastated Mr. Delay, "driving a stake through the heart of what he thought would be his golden years."
Getty Images
Former House Majority Leader Tom Delay at the Travis County Courthouse on Jan. 10, 2011, in Austin, Texas.

.
During the 2010 trial, prosecutors said Mr. DeLay was involved in a Texas-based Republican political committee that funneled $190,000 in corporate contributions to a committee associated with the Republican National Committee that later contributed the amount to seven Texas state candidates.
But the appellate court ruled that the contributions were legal because they came from a bank account that wasn't commingled with the one that contained the corporate donations. "The state failed in its burden to prove that the funds that were delivered to the seven candidates were ever tainted," the court said.

.
Since leaving office, the 66-year-old former congressman has been a consultant and public speaker. He also appeared on the television show "Dancing with the Stars."


.
A version of this article appeared September 19, 2013, on page A5 in the U.S. edition of The Wall Street Journal, with the headline: Texas Appeals Court Reverses Tom DeLay's 2010 Conviction.

WONDER WOMAN: MARY EDWARDS WALKER, WINNER OF THE CONGRESSIONAL MEDAL OF HONOR

!!!!




Mary Edwards Walker
September 20, 1863, brought the end of the Battle of Chickamauga in northwest Georgia, some of the hardest fighting of the Civil War. As Union casualties streamed into Chattanooga, Tennessee, many soldiers were surprised to find that the doctor tending their wounds was a woman dressed in gold-striped trousers, a green surgeon’s sash, and a straw hat with an ostrich feather.

Mary Edwards Walker had graduated from Syracuse Medical College eight years earlier, becoming one of America’s first female doctors. That was unusual enough, but Walker set herself even further apart by refusing to wear long, heavy dresses, opting instead for pants. She was born to break molds. When the Civil War began, she volunteered to serve as a doctor. The Army wasn’t sure what to make of her, but doctors were in short supply, and she was soon working near Union lines as a volunteer field surgeon. She requested a commission as an officer but was turned down since she was a woman. She went on volunteering, treating both soldiers and civilians. In April 1864 she was captured and spent four months in a Richmond prison until exchanged for a Confederate officer.

After the war the Army awarded Dr. Walker the Medal of Honor in recognition of her service. To Walker, the medal represented the recognition she had so long wanted. She was outraged when, in 1916, the Army decided to rescind more than 900 medals as undeserved— including hers, because she had never officially been in the Army. Walker refused to return her award. On the contrary, she proudly wore it every day for the rest of her life.

In 1977 the Army restored Mary Edwards Walker’s medal on the grounds that, had she been a man, she would have been commissioned as an officer. She remains the sole female recipient of the Medal of Honor.

- WILLIAM BENNETT

Sunday, September 15, 2013

HAVING WON THE WAR IN IRAQ, THE US SHOULD HAVE SETTLED IN FOR THE LONG HAUL

!!!!

From the Iraqi pullout to the disaster in Syria

by Jeff Jacoby
The Boston Globe
September 15, 2013




DEMOCRATS JEERED when John McCain told a New Hampshire audience during the 2008 presidential campaign that he would be glad to see US troops remain in Iraq for decades, even a century, once the war was over. "We've been in Japan for 60 years [and] in South Korea for 50 years," he said. A similar long-term stay in a postwar Iraq, buttressing allies and providing stability in a volatile region, would "be fine with me as long as Americans are not being injured or harmed or wounded or killed."
Germany, Japan, and South Korea are among the top 14 countries where US troops are deployed. When the United States maintains a long-term presence, hard-won wartime gains are usually made permanent. When American troops are pulled out prematurely — as in Iraq, Vietnam, or Lebanon — peace and prosperity rarely last. (Source: Dept. of Defense, via VetFriends.com)

.

McCain's political foes had a field day with that. Though he had plainly been speaking of a friendly peacetime presence, Democrats hammered him as an insatiable warmonger. Then-Senator Barack Obama claimed the Arizona Republican was "willing to send our troops into another 100 years of war in Iraq." Howard Dean, the Democratic Party chairman, declared: "McCain's strategy is a war without end." In a TV ad aired by MoveOn.org, a new mother, playing with her baby boy, told McCain that if he was counting on using her little Alex as cannon fodder in Iraq, "you can't have him."
.

Yet McCain was right. Having won a difficult war in Iraq, the United States should have settled in for the long haul, just as we did in Japan, Germany, Italy, and South Korea, where tens of thousands of American troops remain to this day. Instead President Obama pulled the troops out, as he had always made clear he would. Iraq's fragile constitutional democracy, so hard-won, was left to fend for itself. Al Qaeda in Iraq, all but wiped out, gained a new lease on life. Now a new generation of Americans, including young Alex, is learning that the loss of US influence makes the world a more menacing place.
.

We are nearly five years into a presidency whose foreign policy is driven by the conviction that America's profile in the world, above all the Muslim world, must be lowered. "One of the things I intend to do as president is restore America's standing in the world," Obama vowed as he pursued the presidency in 2008. Abandoning Iraq wasn't the way to do it. America's standing in the world has reached a new low. So low that even Bashar al-Assad can thumb his nose at an explicit presidential "red line" — then laugh as Vladimir Putin effortlessly suckers Washington into doing nothing about it.
.

George W. Bush made plenty of mistakes, but he understood the difference between leading and "leading from behind." When he went to Congress for authorization to remove Saddam Hussein from power, he got it. When he told Saddam to leave Iraq or be forcibly overthrown, he made good his threat. When he explained the need for military action, he didn't need to reassure Americans that their commander-in-chief "doesn't do pinpricks."
.

All American presidents engender resentment and opposition on the world stage. It goes with the job of leading the world's superpower. Yet Obama was certain that the world couldn't help but adore an America wise enough to elevate him to the White House. From his earliest days as a presidential candidate, Obama had argued that Bush had eroded America's international status by waging a "dumb" war in Iraq and showing insufficient respect for diplomatic engagement. He would reverse course, he promised voters, and that would make everything better. "The world will have confidence that I am listening to them, and that our future and our security is tied up with our ability to work with other countries."
.

But what the world has learned from listening to Obama is that he confuses moral preening with effective leadership. That he is deeply uncomfortable with America's military preeminence. That it's not hard to call the bluff of this president who says he doesn't bluff.
.

Victims of the chemical weapons attack outside Damascus in August. The region's worst brutes were emboldened when the US walked away from Iraq in 2011.

















 .
.
And that he still doesn't realize how much harm was set in motion by the wholesale withdrawal from Iraq. As the US military walked away, internal Iraqi politics grew more authoritarian. Sunni terrorism revived. Al-Qaeda in Iraq started sending offshoots into Syria. Iraqi Shiites, meanwhile, lost their American buffer against Iran. "If American airpower were still in Baghdad," writes Reuel Marc Gerecht of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, "Tehran could not resupply Syria and Lebanese Hezbollah by air, and the Assad regime would lose the two resources most critical to its survival."
.

A long-term US presence could have been such a blessing for postwar Iraq, nurturing Arab democracy and moderation, giving peace and prosperity the chance they were given in Germany, Japan, and Korea. Instead we walked away, undercutting our friends and our reputation, and leaving a vacuum the region's worst brutes moved to fill.
.
.
.
(Jeff Jacoby is a columnist for The Boston Globe).

Saturday, September 14, 2013

SENATOR TED CRUZ IS TRULY AN OUTSTANDING PERSON IN EVERY RESPECT

!!!!

Who is Ted Cruz … Really?

Ted Cruz is the junior U.S. Senator from Texas. Elected in 2012 as a Republican, he’s been branded a rebel since he often takes positions that aggravate older, more senior lawmakers, (even within his own party). His self-professed goal is to fan the flames of conservatism lit by Ronald Reagan.
Ted Cruz
.
.
.

Rafael Edward “Ted” Cruz was born in Calgary, Alberta, on December 22, 1970, where his parents, Eleanor Elizabeth Wilson Darragh and Rafael Bienvenido Cruz were living while working in the energy exploration field. His parents had just launched a seismic-data processing business supporting oil drillers.
.

Cruz’s father was born in 1939 in Matanzas, Cuba and “suffered beatings and imprisonment for protesting the oppressive regime” of then Dictator Fulgencio Batista.
The elder Cruz says that when he was fourteen, he fought alongside Fidel Castro’s forces to overthrow Batista, Cuba’s U.S.-backed dictator. He was later to become a staunch critic of Castro when the rebel leader took control and began seizing private property and suppressing dissent, it was then that he learned that Castro was a Communist.
By 1957, spurred by his aversion to the Castro regime, the 18-year-old Cruz decided to get out of Cuba by applying to the University of Texas. Upon being admitted, he got a four-year student visa at the U.S. Consulate in Havana and moved to Austin, Texas to study at the University of Texas.
“I came to this country legally,” Cruz’s father says. “I came here with a legal visa, and … every step of the way, I have been here legally.“
He arrived in Austin knowing no English and with only $100 sewn into his underwear. He worked his way through college as a dishwasher, making 50 cents an hour, subsequently earning a degree in mathematics.
His younger sister fought in the counter-revolution and was tortured by the new regime. He remained regretful for his early support of Castro, and emphatically conveyed his feelings to young Ted over the following years.
Today, Cruz’s father is now a pastor in Carrollton, Texas, a suburb of Dallas. He became a U.S. citizen in 2005.
.

Cruz’s mother, Eleanor Darragh, the second-youngest of 17 children, was born and raised in Wilmington, Delaware, in a family of Irish and Italian descent. She was the first person in her family to attend college. She earned a degree in mathematics from Rice University in Houston in the 1950s, while working summers at Foley’s Department Store and Shell Oil. She later worked in Houston as a computer programmer at Shell.
She was four years older than Rafael Cruz when they met. He had two daughters from a previous marriage who spent summers with the couple.
The couple moved to Canada, and co-founded a seismic-data processing business, supporting the oil exploration that was enjoying a boom there. Ted was born three days before Christmas in 1970 in Calgary, where his parents’ were living at the time.
Three years later, while living in Alberta, a slump hit the price of oil and Raphael and Darragh sold their business. They separated shortly thereafter and Raphael moved back to Houston. Six months later, in 1974, Darragh also returned to Houston, though they remained estranged.
Cruz was away at Princeton University when his parents’ second business foundered and they later divorced. “The oil industry had really taken a dive and they had gone bankrupt – they lost everything when oil tanked,” Cruz said.
.

Education

As Ted was growing up, “he was very curious and very determined,” his mother recalled. It wasn’t until Ted was well along in grade school, though, that Darragh grasped he might be intellectually gifted.
She chauffeured him to a series of private and church-related schools. Some were far from home. They included Montessori and Southern Baptist institutions, as well as a school that he recalled had many Jewish students and another, the Awty International School that his mother said enrolled children of French diplomats.
“I wasn’t that aware that he was precocious,” Darragh said. “He was my only child.”
Cruz attended high school at Faith West Academy in Katy, Texas, (a small city of 15,000, about 30 miles west of Houston) and later graduated from Second Baptist High School in Houston as valedictorian in 1988.
After high school, he enrolled in Princeton University.
Cruz graduated cum laude from Princeton in 1992. While at Princeton, he competed for the American Whig-Cliosophic Society’s Debate Panel and won the top speaker award at both the 1992 U.S. National Debating Championship and the 1992 North American Debating Championship. In 1992, he was also named U.S. National Speaker of the Year and Team of the Year (with his debate partner, David Panton). Cruz was also a semi-finalist at the 1995 World Universities Debating Championship.
“He’s a person of strong opinions,” said Robert P. George, a jurisprudence professor who was Cruz’s mentor at Princeton. “But he’s a person who earns his right to his opinions by understanding the best arguments on the other side.”
Cruz’s senior thesis was on the separation of powers, titled “Clipping the Wings of Angels” and drew its inspiration from a passage attributed to President James Madison: “If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary.”
Cruz argued that the drafters of the Constitution intended to protect the rights of their constituents, and the last two items in the Bill of Rights offered an explicit stop against an all-powerful state. Cruz wrote: “They simply do so from different directions. The Tenth stops new powers, and the Ninth fortifies all other rights, or non-powers.”
After graduating from Princeton, Cruz attended Harvard Law School, graduating magna cum laude in 1995. While at Harvard Law, Cruz was a primary editor of the Harvard Law Review, and executive editor of the Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, and a founding editor of the Harvard Latino Law Review.
Referring to Cruz’s time as a student at Harvard Law, Professor Alan Dershowitz said, “Cruz was off-the-charts brilliant.” Cruz was a “terrific student,” “He was always very active in class, presenting a libertarian point of view. He didn’t strike me as a social conservative, more of a libertarian.”
“He had brilliant insights and he was clearly among the top students, as revealed by his class responses,” “Without a doubt he is among the smartest students I’ve ever had… I’ve had great students but he has to be at the top of anyone’s short list, in terms of raw brain power.” Dershowitz added.
It’s going to be rather difficult for the left to paint Ted Cruz as “dumb” or a “knuckle-dragger,” when a noted liberal like famed Harvard Law School’s Alan Dershowitz has such high praise for Cruz’s brainpower.
.
After college

Cruz served as a law clerk to J. Michael Luttig of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in 1995 and William Rehnquist, Chief Justice of the United States in 1996. Cruz was the first Hispanic ever to clerk for a Chief Justice of the United States.
After Cruz finished his clerkships, he took a position with Cooper, Carvin & Rosenthal, now known as Cooper & Kirk, LLC, for a couple of years from 1997 to 1998.
In 1998, Cruz served as private counsel for Congressman John Boehner during Boehner’s lawsuit against Congressman Jim McDermott for releasing a tape recording of a Boehner telephone conversation.
Cruz joined the Bush-Cheney campaign in 1999 as a domestic policy adviser, advising President George W. Bush on a wide range of policy and legal matters, including civil justice, criminal justice, constitutional law, immigration, and government reform.
Cruz assisted in assembling the Bush legal team, devise strategy, and draft pleadings in the Florida and U.S. Supreme Courts during the 2000 Florida presidential recounts, winning twice in the U.S. Supreme Court.
After President Bush took office, Cruz served as an associate deputy attorney general in the U.S. Justice Department and as the director of policy planning at the U.S. Federal Trade Commission.
.

Cruz serves Texas
 
On January 9, 2003, Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott appointed Cruz to the office of Solicitor General of Texas. At 33 years old, he was the youngest solicitor general in American history. Cruz served in that position from 2003 to 2008.
The following year, Cruz accepted a teaching invitation by the University of Texas School of Law and served as an Adjunct Professor of Law until 2009.
Cruz has authored more than 80 United States Supreme Court briefs and presented 43 oral arguments, including nine before the United States Supreme Court.
Cruz’s record of having argued before the Supreme Court nine times is more than any practicing lawyer in Texas or any current member of Congress. Cruz has commented on his nine cases in front of the U.S. Supreme Court: “We ended up year after year arguing some of the biggest cases in the country. There was a degree of serendipity in that, but there was also a concerted effort to seek out and lead conservative fights.”
In the landmark case of District of Columbia v. Heller, Cruz drafted the amicus brief signed by attorneys general of 31 states, which said that the D.C. handgun ban should be struck down as infringing upon the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. Cruz also presented oral argument for the amici states in the companion case to Heller before the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.
In addition to his victory in Heller, Cruz has successfully defended the constitutionality of Ten Commandments monument on the Texas  State Capitol grounds before the Fifth Circuit and the U.S. Supreme Court, winning 5-4 in Van Orden v. Perry.
Cruz authored a U.S. Supreme Court brief for all 50 states successfully defending the recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance in public schools, winning 9-0 in Elk Grove Unified School District v. Newdow.
Cruz served as lead counsel for the state and successfully defended the multiple litigation challenges to the 2003 Texas congressional redistricting plan in state and federal district courts and before the U.S. Supreme Court, winning 5-4 in League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry.
Cruz also successfully defended, in Medellin v. Texas, the State of Texas against an attempt by the International Court of Justice to re-open the criminal convictions of 51 murderers on death row throughout the United States.
During his time as Solicitor General of Texas, Cruz was widely viewed as one of the top constitutional litigators in the country, and in 2010, was named as one of the “25 Greatest Texas Lawyers of the Past Quarter Century” by the respected weekly newspaper Texas Lawyer. Several other publications, namely, Chambers USA, Legal 500, and Law 360, referred to him as one of the top appellate litigators in the country.
.

Private Practice


 After leaving the Solicitor General position in 2008, he worked in a private law firm in Houston, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, often representing corporate clients, until he was sworn in as a U.S. Senator in 2013. At Morgan, Lewis, he led the firm’s U.S. Supreme Court and national appellate litigation practice.
Disclosures show Cruz has earned $1.5 million to $1.7 million annually representing about 30 major corporations as a partner at Morgan Lewis, specializing in so-called “high stakes” corporate appeals.
.

Ted Cruz, U.S. Senator

Cruz’s election to the U.S. Senate has been described by the Washington Post as “the biggest upset of 2012 . . . a true grassroots victory against very long odds.” On January 19, 2011, after U.S. Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison said she would not seek reelection, Cruz announced his candidacy.
In the Republican senatorial primary, Cruz ran against sitting Lieutenant Governor David Dewhurst. Cruz was endorsed by the Club for Growth, a fiscally conservative political action committee; Erick Erickson, editor of prominent conservative blog RedState; the FreedomWorks for America super PAC; nationally syndicated radio host Mark Levin; former Attorney General Edwin Meese; Tea Party Express; Young Conservatives of Texas; and U.S. Senators Tom Coburn, Jim DeMint, Mike Lee, Rand Paul, and Pat Toomey.
He was also endorsed by former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin and former Texas Congressman Ron Paul, George P. Bush and former U.S. Senator from Pennsylvania Rick Santorum.
Cruz won the runoff for the Republican nomination with a 14-point margin over Dewhurst. In the November 6 general election, Cruz faced Democrat Paul Sadler, an attorney and a former state representative from Henderson, in east Texas. Cruz won with 4.5 million votes (56.4%) to Sadler’s 3.2 million (40.6%) to become Texas’ junior senator; John Cornyn is currently the state’s senior Senator. Two minor candidates got the remaining 3% of the vote. Cruz got 40% of the Hispanic vote.
.

Political positions

Cruz is a gun-rights supporter. On March 25, 2013, an announcement was made by Cruz and U.S. Senators Rand Paul and Mike Lee threatening that they would filibuster any legislation that would entail gun control, such as the Manchin-Toomey Amendment, which would require additional background checks on sales at gun shows.
On April 17, 2013, Cruz voted against the Manchin-Toomey Amendment. Republicans successfully filibustered the amendment by a vote of 54–46, as 60 votes were needed for cloture.
Cruz also supports a federal definition of marriage and opposes same-sex marriage.
He favors building a border wall, boots on the ground and greater militarization of the U.S.-Mexico border. He is also opposed to the Dream Act.
Regarding foreign policy, Cruz has stated that America had no “dog in the fight” during the Syrian civil war.
He believes that much of federal government – including the U.S. Dept. of Education, the National Endowment for the Arts and the IRS – should be abolished to pay down national debt.
He is against UN Agenda 21, a scheme Cruz says was originated by George Soros. In case you’re unfamiliar with Agenda 21, know this: Nancy Pelosi, John Kerry, and Harry Reid are for it – need I say more? Here is a link to more about Agenda 21.
He has stated that he believes that “Sharia law is an enormous problem” in this country.
In an interview with the Texas Tribune Cruz labeled Social Security a “ponzi scheme” and outlined a three-step plan to gut the program. Cruz would raise the Social Security retirement age, cut future benefits, and implement a George W. Bush-style plan to privatize much of the program.
.

Selected Senate Votes

  • S. 744 Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act, Cruz voted “Nay” with 31 others. Cloture invoked.
  • S. Amdt 1197, Required the Completion of the Fence Along the United States-Mexico Border, Cruz voted “Yea” with 38 others. Amendment rejected.
  • S. Amdt 711, Establishes Regulations for Assault Weapons, Cruz voted “Nay” with 59 others. Amendment rejected.
  • S. Amdt 714, Limits Firearm Magazine Capacity, Cruz voted “Nay” with 54 others, Amendment rejected.
  • S. Amdt 715, Required Background Checks for All Firearm Purchases, Cruz voted “Nay” with 45 others. Amendment rejected.
  • S. Amdt 719, Authorizes Reciprocity for the Carrying of Certain Concealed Firearms, Cruz voted “Yea” with 42 others. Amendment rejected.
  • S. Amdt 139, Prohibits the United States From Entering into the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty, Cruz voted “Yea” with 52 others. Amendment adopted.
  • S. Con Res 8, Budget Continuing Resolution, Cruz voted “Nay” with 48 others. Joint resolution passed.
  • S. Amdt 66, Temporarily Freezes the Hiring of Nonessential Federal Employees, Cruz voted “Yea” with 53 others. Amendment rejected.
  • S. Amdt 30, To Prohibit the Use of Funds to Carry Out the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Cruz is a sponsor of this legislation.
To see all of Senator Cruz’s   votes, click on Project Vote Smart.   


A Few Cruz Quotes

Cruz said: “We need to return to the framers’ vision of a constitutionally limited federal government,” he said. “Unchecked government power always threatens liberty.”
He is also fond of a quote from the curriculum he studied at the Storey Free Enterprise Education Center: “Government is never a source of goods. Everything that government gives you; it must first take from you.”
To sum up Cruz’s philosophy in one sentence, he says, “I will go to my grave with Ronald Wilson Reagan defining what it means to be president.”
 .

Is Cruz qualified to be President?

This question is already at the forefront of any discussion of Cruz and his possible presidential aspirations. The immediate knee-jerk reaction of those who are in the “anti-Cruz” camp is that he was born in Canada and based on that alone, is ineligible. But that’s simply an uninformed statement and the ineligible part isn’t true.
The Constitution defines three requirements to be President: one must be 35 years of age, a resident within the United States for 14 years, and a “natural born Citizen.” Cruz fulfills the first two requirements easily.
The only questionable area is the term “natural born Citizen.”
The qualifications to be President of the United States are set out in the Constitution, at Article II, Section 1, clause 5:
“No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been Fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.”
The majority of legal and historical opinion has been that Cruz would be eligible given that he was a U.S. citizen at birth as his mother was a U.S. citizen who lived in the U.S. for more than 10 years. On August 19, 2013,
The most authoritative and unbiased source short of the U.S. Supreme Court, would be the Congressional Research Service.
In case you aren’t familiar with the CRS, they are a legislative branch agency within the Library of Congress and work exclusively for the United States Congress. They provide policy and legal analysis to committees and Members of both the House and Senate, regardless of party affiliation. The CRS is well-known for analysis that is authoritative, confidential, objective and nonpartisan.
CRS reviewed the natural-born issue in a November 14, 2011 report based on questions relating to president Obama’s qualifications. Coincidentally, the 53-page report also covers Cruz’s situation. It concludes that someone born abroad to an American parent could legally qualify to be president. You can read the full report (.pdf) here.
Here is an excerpt from the CRS report that highlights a major difference between the circumstances of Senator Cruz’s birth and that of president Obama, as it relates to the natural-born qualification:
The importance to some in arguing that President Obama was born outside of the United States is that, given that the President’s father was not a U.S. citizen at the time of the President’s birth, the federal laws then, in 1961, would have required for citizenship “at birth” of one born outside of the United States to only one citizen-parent, that such citizen-parent have resided in the United States for not less than ten years, at least five of which were after the age of fourteen (8 U.S.C. §1401(a)(7)) (1958 ed.), a requirement that the President’s mother, because of her age, would not have met.
The statement that covers Cruz’s specific situation concludes:
“The weight of more recent federal cases, as well as the majority of scholarship on the subject, also indicates that the term ‘natural born citizen’ would most likely include, as well as native born citizens, those born abroad to U.S. citizen-parents, at least one of whom had previously resided in the United States, or those born abroad to one U.S. citizen parent who, prior to the birth, had met the requirements of federal law for physical presence in the country.”
The CRS’ findings are nonpartisan and represent a legal opinion, but they’re also nonbinding.
It does appear, however, that Cruz is a dual citizen of both Canada and the United States. Canada considers anyone born in Canada since 1947 a Canadian citizen and he is a citizen of the U.S. based on his mother being a U.S. citizen.
He has said that if it is true that he also is a Canadian citizen, he will renounce his Canadian citizenship.
In order to renounce his Canadian citizenship, a simple statement is not enough. He’ll have to complete an “Application to Renounce Canadian Citizenship” and pay a $100 fee. The application (barring any issues), typically takes about four months to process, after which he will be sent a “Certificate of Renunciation.”
Cruz released his Canadian birth certificate to The Dallas Morning News on Aug. 18, 2013.
 Ted Cruz birth certificate
(Click to enlarge)
Ted’s Family

Cruz and his wife, Heidi Suzanne Cruz (née Nelson), have two daughters, Caroline Camille and Catherine Christiane, ages five and two. A live-in nanny cares for them, said Ted’s mother, Darragh. She lives in the same condo complex in Houston, and helps out.
Cruz’s wife is a heavy-hitter in her own right.
She is the Region Head for the Southwest Region in the Investment Management Division of Goldman, Sachs & Co. She leads 40 professionals responsible for over $14 billion in investments for clients throughout Texas, Oklahoma, Louisiana, Arkansas, Mississippi, New Mexico, and Colorado.
In the 1990s, Heidi worked as an investment banker in New York, focusing on Latin America mergers and acquisitions and structured finance. In that capacity, Heidi was involved in advisory engagements and capital markets transactions for some of the largest energy companies in the Americas.
In the public sector, Heidi served in the White House as the Economic Director for the Western Hemisphere at the National Security Council, under then-National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice; as the Director of the Latin America Office at the U.S. Treasury Department; and as Special Policy Assistant to Ambassador Robert B. Zoellick, then-U.S. Trade Representative.
Her publications include a book chapter entitled “Expanding Opportunity Through Free Trade,” a book chapter in EXCHANGE RATE POLICIES FOR EMERGING MARKET ECONOMIES, and a Harvard Case Study, “American International Group”.
Heidi received an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School, a Masters of European Business from Universite Libre de Bruxelles in Brussels, Belgium, and graduated Phi Beta Kappa with a B.A. in Economics and International Relations from Claremont McKenna College.
She is currently a member of the Texas Business Leadership Council and serves on the board of the Greater Houston Partnership, Houston’s Museum of Fine Arts European Art Sub-Committee, the Advancement Board of the Yes Prep Public Schools of Houston, the Advisory Board of Living Water International, and on the Advisory Board of the Robert Day School of Economics and Finance at Claremont McKenna College in California.
NOTE: I’ve endeavored to verify all information contained herein, however if you find some element that you believe to be false or misleading, please respond with evidence showing what is claimed to be false or misleading and if the evidence is convincing, I will update or remove the incorrect data.


END



 Responses to Who is Ted Cruz … Really?

abyssum says:
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
I have great admiration for Senator Ted Cruz. I supported his candidacy and I voted for him. I would like to see him run for the Presidency. However, I am troubled by the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in Minor v Happersett that “a natural born citizen, as opposed to a native born citizen, is someone born on the soil of the United States of two parents, both of whom were citizens of the United States at the time of the birth of the subject person.” That seems like an insurmountable obstacle for Ted Cruz, much to my regret.

Wednesday, September 11, 2013

IN COLORADO, TWO DEMOCRATS WHO PUSHED GUN CONTROL, ARE RECALLED FROM THE SENATE. A SIGN OF THE TIMES?

!!!!



Bloomberg's Misfire

 

By JASON L. RILEY

New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg wasn't on the ballot Tuesday, but he still managed to lose a couple of important elections.
The multibillionaire mayor moonlights as an anti-gun activist, financially backing political candidates nationwide who share is opposition to the Second Amendment. In Colorado Tuesday, two recipients of the mayor's largess, state Senate President John Morse and state Sen. Angela Giron, were ousted in recall elections. Both Democratic lawmakers had played key roles in helping the state pass stricter gun laws after mass shootings at a Colorado movie theater and Connecticut elementary school.
"While both sides campaigned vigorously, knocking on doors, holding rallies and driving voters to the polls, gun-control advocates far outspent their opponents," reports the New York Times. "A range of philanthropists, liberal political groups, unions and activists raised a total of $3 million to defend Mr. Morse and Ms. Giron. Mr. Bloomberg personally gave $350,000."
Republicans will replace Sens. Morse and Giron, but Democrats will still control the Colorado legislature. Nevertheless, Republicans have been emboldened by the successful recall effort. "Gov. John Hickenlooper—once deemed so unbeatable that the GOP couldn't even find a candidate to run against him in 2014—now faces falling approval ratings and a crowded field of Republican contenders, in part for backing stricter gun measures," reports the Denver Post.