Saturday, November 22, 2008




John Roberts-Chief Justice of The Supreme Court

United States Supreme Court

1 First Street NE

Washington,D.C. 20543

Dear Honorable Sir:

Below this letter is a second, entitled "A Possible Constitutional Crisis", which I wrote prior to the Nov. 4th election. You may freely share my correspondence with anyone, if you wish. As I mentioned in that letter, moral issues drove me to write in defense of my Faith and the UNBORN.

Though Pres.Elect Barack Obama claims to have been born in Hawaii, a growing number of lawsuits claiming otherwise must be addressed promptly since their claims, if substantiated, would make him ineligible to assume the Office of President of the United States. An attorney, Mr. Philip Berg,Esq., of Philadelphia, Pa. has carried his lawsuit up to Justice Souter of your Court. All the particulars concerning this case including the reasons for his lawsuit have been presented to Justice Souter.

I am aware of many lawsuits filed in State Courts, all claiming that Pres.-Elect Obama was not born in Hawaii. The proof, or disproof of these claims may rest in part with his birth certificate on file with the Government of Hawaii. Unfortunately, all efforts to have him release a verifiable birth certificate have been met with a stony silence and a refusal to authorize the release of such. The Media, also, has been strangely quiet about releasing any information about this. A "certificate of live birth" (COLB) copy was posted on an Obama website months ago and declared by him to have been reproduced from an original in his possession. Many independent examiners have declared that the web posting is , in fact, a fraudulent document. Their challenge is not against what is on the certificate but what is not on it: no hospital of birth, no doctor's name, no witnesses, no government signature or seal, no identifying birth certificate number (the number is blacked out). All of these concerns, if wrong, could easily be dismissed by his immediately authorizing the Hawaiian authority to release a certified copy of his original birth certificate to the Courts but he refuses to cooperate, in spite of the mounting number of legal challenges surfacing weekly in attempts to arrive at the truth. Is this the transparency the Pres.-Elect offers to the American people ?

Senator John McCain fought for our Country and suffered for five and one half years in a Vietman prison for his patriotism. He has been truly "vetted", both by war and by law, and confirmed as an American lawfully entitled to seek the Office of President.. In contrast, Senator(now Pres.-Elect) Obama has exhibited complete secrecy regarding his eligibility for the same Office. Birth records, school records, Selective Service records,etc.....all withheld or only submitted under pressure. Did he fear that any or all of these documents might have contained information which would bar him from running for elective office under the U.S. Constitution, as, for example, possibly identifying him as a foreign national ? Something to reflect on: The Vietnamese knew more about John McCain than most Americans know about Barack Obama !

When "Joe, the plumber" (Joseph Wurzelbacher) became an Ohio "celebrity" the Democratic Party lost no time in gaining access to and airing his financial records and other details about him, in an attempt to "mute" his voice. In contrast, the Party was very silent or dismissive about inquiries arising regarding Obama's birth certificate. In fairness, the head of the Democratic Commission in Alaska, which found Governor Sarah Palin innocent of misconduct, graciously said that they were making their findings public before the election, so as not to leave a "cloud of suspicion" hanging over her head. Now that's transparency. It is too bad that a man who would be President refuses to display that same transparency.

If anyone were to accuse me of "grasping at straws" after the Election, I would plead "guilty, as charged", for to stand by while an incoming Administration, led by a secretive Pres.-Elect is preparing to completely open the "bloodgates" and unleash the abortion industry upon an estimated additional 125,000 infants yearly would be indefensible ! Oh yes-if anyone raised a claim of "racism" as a reason for my writing, I would simply suggest that they run that idea past Alan Keyes, a prominent, well-known black man who previously ran for President of the United States and recently filed his own lawsuit in California, challenging the right of Pres-Elect Obama to seek the Office of President. If they also considered Mr.Keyes as "racist" I guess they believe that he is Caucasian.

In conclusion, may I say that unless Pres.-Elect Obama submits definite proof that he has not circumvented the U.S. Constitution as to his elegibility for this Office, he will be escalating a crisis which has already reached the highest Court in our Land through his silence.. As that silence continues so does the number of lawsuits. At my last count that now has reached eighteen.

GOD ASSEMBLES-mankind disassembles (graphically) !

This letter is about a man who said that, on his first day in office, he would make time to sign a Freedom of Choice Act (FOCA) bill, thereby consigning an estimated one hundred twenty five thousand infants to death yearly ! No hesitation on his part there, but that same man has no time, or is it "intention",to produce a legitimate birth certificate which could confirm his authority to sign such a bill. Referring to an ad from Senator Clinton's campaign, he implied that he, in fact, would be the one ready "from day one" to take a three AM call from anywhere in the World. I have one question...."would that include Hawaii "?

A glaring fact keeps recurring, which cannot be ignored. Each time Pres-Elect Obama's legal team(s) goes into court their defense is to challenge the claimant's right to sue him. Never once did they present a certified birth certificate which may have won their case for them. Are they inept ? I don't believe so. Do they fear the consequences of such a disclosure " I do think so. If he has the legal right to assume the Presidency of the United States let it be confirmed by evidence so that all will recognize that right, even those in opposition to him. If, on the other hand, he has no legal right to the Office let the Supreme Court or other empowered governing body declare him ineligible.

Your Honor, on Jan.20,2009, Pres.-Elect Obama will be asked to take an oath to defend our Constitution. If he is not a natural-born citizen, as required by the Constitution, his oath would be invalid. I earnestly request that the Supreme Court act on this grave issue before it by instructing Pres.-Elect Obama to immediately provide the documents requested in the lawsuits so that his true status may be determined and a Constitutional Crisis averted.

Respectfully yours,

RobertQuinn 69-11 67th Place,Glendale,New York 11385





Approximately 230 years ago the Revolutionary War began. When it ended, the United States of America was born. Liberty was proclaimed and laws were enacted under The Constitution of the United States. Today, that Constitutional liberty is sorely threatened because one aspirant for the office of President of the United States, Senator Barack Obama, remains silent while being challlenged, through an increasing number of lawsuits in various states, to confirm that he is, in fact, a natural-born citizen of the United States of America and eligible to seek the office of President. He has stone-walled all efforts to authenticate his proof of citizenship. If

any readers of this letter are unaware of this legal crisis it is because the major media outlets make no mention of possible legal restrictions which could bar the Senator from seeking this office. In fact, on Oct.25, I wrote to Bill O'Reilly of Fox News in New York about the media silence ( incl.Fox) and, with tongue in cheek, asked if we would only be made aware of the lawsuits after judges had ruled on them.

Ironically, a few days before, a federal judge dismissed a lawsuit by the former Ass't Attorney General of Philadelphia, Pa., Mr.Philip Berg, by declaring that Mr.Berg did not prove that he would suffer harm to himself if Senator Obama was declared eligible to run for President. The next day, Newsday,Long Island,New York's major newspaper, mentioned this case for the first time by simply mentioning the Dismissal of the lawsuit. Mr. Berg is now taking this issue directly and immediately to the U.S.Supreme Court. I wonder if a class-action suit is in the works.

The most compelling issue in this case was the request for a valid copy of Senator Obama's Hawaiian birth certificate (not the differing "Cert.of Live Birth"), since claims were made that he was actually born in Mombasa,Kenya. Ominously, the Government of Kenya recently said that they will not release any documents pertaining to the Senator until the U.S. elections are over. Mr.Berg, in his lawsuit, also requested that a "certificate of USA citizenship" be produced, since Senator Obama was believed to have been a citizen of Indonesia for some time, under the name of Barry Soetoro.

Consider-a simple request to produce two valid documents, which Mr.Berg stated in his lawsuit would be sufficient for withdrawing the lawsuit. Now, three months later, the Senator still refuses to provide these documents for examination by Federal or State authorities....or anyone else ! Would an average citizen act in such a manner ? For that matter, should anyone seeking the highest office in the Land act this way ? On the contrary, and, in fact, I know of eight instances where average citizens have now instituted lawsuits to force their respective States to insist that Senator Obama either provide a valid birth certificate or see his name removed from the election ballots of those States.

I would also like to mention an "above average" citizen, Senator John McCain, who has served his Country bravely and faithfully since he was seventeen years of age. His valid citizenship, since he was born in the Canal Zone, has been confirmed by the U.S.Senate. He could, and would immediately produce a certified copy of his birth certificate, if requested. The only time that he couldn't comply with such a request was the five and one-half years he was "tied up" in Vietnam on Government

business. In contrast, Senator Obama could easily obtain any existing valid birth certificate within forty-eight hours from Hawaiian authorities. Fast forward-eight lawsuits and one petition to the Supreme Court later and he still won't answer the three-am phonecall !


The more we seek to learn about Senator Obama, the more concerned about him we become. Asking for transparency, we are repaid with more secrecy. Here are some of the records which, it has been reported, he refuses to release:

Occidental College records Columbia College records

Harvard College records Selective Service Registration

Medical records Illinois State Senate records

Cert.copy of Original Birth Certificate Embossed signed paper Cert.of Live Birth

With all this secrecy, he expects us to accept his birth record as legitimate, solely on his word ! I've gone that route before but it was for Someone born in a manger over 2,000 years ago, in a little town called Bethlehem.


As I've said in previous letters, I am morally driven, not racially, to engage in this issue. All humanity is entitled to a "redress of grievances." Sadly, however, on the issue of life those in the womb are being excluded from this "right" by many, and a President Obama would swell the casualty list enormously ! He said that, as President, he would allow abortions to be performed throughtout the entire nine months of a pregnancy and would even take this position to the ultimate end: if any child survived an abortion attempt and lived to exit it's mother's womb the Obama Party would allow the child to die, if the mother so wished !

We keep hearing the "antiseptic" phrase "fewer and safer abortions", while closing in on 50,000,000 (that's millions). I have two questions: First, how can permitting more abortions result in fewer abortions. Am I doing the math wrong. Secondly, a "safe" abortion, to be honest, means only one person will exit the hospital alive. Why not re-term it a "half-safe" abortion ? For that matter, drawing from the world of credit cards I would offer an added definition of abortion-IDENTITY THEFT !

To my fellow Catholics, and all others who honestly believe their genuine concerns about financial conditions, war, the environment, etc. equate with abortion I offer a simple reflection for them. Imagine Senator Obama,(who has promised to make abortion the "Law of the Land", from shore to shore), at a rally and being asked by one of his many cheering fans to describe what actually happens to a child during an abortion "procedure". I guarantee that if he dared to answer the request truthfully, the cheers he had been hearing would become tears and sobs would soon echo throughout an empty stadium.

In conclusion, may I point out that, as with my recent letters, I did not speak of issues such as taxes, health insurance,etc., because I was not stepping into the political arena. Senator Obama, however, plunged into the arena of morality and his defenseless targets, the unborn, need our voices before their's are silenced forever.

I am not voting for a political party but for someone who will insure that the unborn's date of birth doesn't immediately become their date of death ! I pray that all those receiving this letter join with me on Nov.4 "pulling" for life-literally.

"Before I formed thee in the womb of thy mother, I knew thee." (Jeremias 1:5)

With prayerful hope and trust,

Robert Quinn

69-11 67th Place,Glendale,New York 11385


No comments:

Post a Comment